The 1909 Darwin Celebration

@article{Richmond2006The1D,
  title={The 1909 Darwin Celebration},
  author={Marsha L. Richmond},
  journal={Isis},
  year={2006},
  volume={97},
  pages={447 - 484}
}
  • M. Richmond
  • Published 1 September 2006
  • Philosophy, Medicine
  • Isis
In June 1909, scientists and dignitaries from 167 different countries gathered in Cambridge to celebrate the hundredth anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth and the fiftieth anniversary of the publication of Origin of Species. The event was one of the most magnificent commemorations in the annals of science. Delegates gathered within the cloisters of Cambridge University not only to honor the “hero” of evolution but also to reassess the underpinnings of Darwinism at a critical juncture. With… Expand
More than a Mentor: Leonard Darwin’s Contribution to the Assimilation of Mendelism into Eugenics and Darwinism
  • N. Serpente
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Journal of the history of biology
  • 2016
TLDR
Leonard Darwin’s efforts to amalgamate Mendelism with both Eugenics and Darwinism in order for the first to base their policies on new scientific developments and to help the second in finding a target for natural selection are discussed. Expand
The Cold War Context of the Golden Jubilee, Or, Why We Think of Mendel as the Father of Genetics
  • A. Wolfe
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Journal of the history of biology
  • 2012
TLDR
An implicit part of this article’s argument is the pervasive impact of the Cold War in unanticipated corners of postwar scientific culture. Expand
Robert Heath Lock and His Textbook of Genetics, 1906
TLDR
Evidence is put forward that Robert Heath Lock's book Recent Progress in the Study of Variation, Heredity, and Evolution in 1906 was the book that inspired H. J. Muller to do genetics and had a major influence on the statistician and geneticist R. A. Fisher. Expand
Mendelian-Mutationism: The Forgotten Evolutionary Synthesis
TLDR
This work finds no evidence of a delay in synthesizing mutation, rules of discrete inheritance, and selection in a Mendelian-Mutationist Synthesis, and suggests contemporary evolutionary thinking seems closer to their more ecumenical view than to the restrictive mid-twentieth-century consensus known as the Modern Synthesis. Expand
The Nature of Tomorrow: Inbreeding in Industrial Agriculture and Evolutionary Thought in Britain and the United States, 1859-1925
Author(s): Varno, Theodore James | Advisor(s): Lesch, John E. | Abstract: Historians of science have long recognized that agricultural institutions helped shape the first generation of geneticists,Expand
Keynesian Eugenics and the Goodness of the World
Abstract This article shows how John Maynard Keynes's lifelong commitment to eugenics was deeply embedded in his political, economic, and philosophical work. At the turn of the century, eugenicsExpand
Beyond Darwinism’s Eclipse: Functional Evolution, Biochemical Recapitulation and Spencerian Emergence in the 1920s and 1930s
During the 1920s and 1930s, many biologists questioned the viability of Darwin’s theory as a mechanism of evolutionary change. In the early 1940s, and only after a number of alternatives wereExpand
The Darwin Enterprise: From Scientific Icon to Global Product
In the early 1970s historians were beginning to complain about “The Darwin Industry” as being too crowded. Enough was enough, many felt, firmly believing that historians could not possibly go onExpand
Eclipsing the Eclipse?: A Neo-Darwinian Historiography Revisited.
TLDR
This paper explores how late nineteenth-century neo-Darwinian conceptualizations of Darwinism were later utilized by several advocates and detractors of the Modern Synthesis, and provides a more thorough look at Darwin's two conflicting accounts of variation, ascribed to struggles in explaining quantitative versus qualitative characters. Expand
A visit to Biotopia: genre, genetics and gardening in the early twentieth century
  • J. Endersby
  • Medicine
  • The British Journal for the History of Science
  • 2018
TLDR
Biotopian themes can be traced back and forth across the porous boundaries between popular and elite writing, showing how biology came to function as public culture. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...