The “Rationality Wars” in Psychology: Where They Are and Where They Could Go

@article{Sturm2012TheW,
  title={The “Rationality Wars” in Psychology: Where They Are and Where They Could Go},
  author={T. Sturm},
  journal={Inquiry},
  year={2012},
  volume={55},
  pages={66 - 81}
}
  • T. Sturm
  • Published 2012
  • Psychology
  • Inquiry
  • Abstract Current psychology of human reasoning is divided into several different approaches. For instance, there is a major dispute over the question whether human beings are able to apply norms of the formal models of rationality such as rules of logic, or probability and decision theory, correctly. While researchers following the “heuristics and biases” approach argue that we deviate systematically from these norms, and so are perhaps deeply irrational, defenders of the “bounded rationality… CONTINUE READING
    17 Citations
    Rationality and Capitalist Schooling
    Rationality and Capitalist Schooling
    Cognitive externalism meets bounded rationality
    • 8
    • PDF
    Hybrid Vigor: Coherence and Correspondence Criteria for Heuristics
    • 1
    Naturalism, tractability and the adaptive toolbox
    • 1
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Of Kids and Unicorns: How Rational Is Children's Trust in Testimonial Knowledge?
    • 1

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 70 REFERENCES
    Without good reason : the rationality debate in philosophy and cognitive science
    • 188
    Ending the Rationality Wars: How to Make Disputes About Human Rationality Disappear
    • 103
    • PDF
    Psychological Challenges for Normative Models
    • 6
    • PDF
    How (far) can rationality be naturalized?
    • 52
    • PDF
    Minimal Rationality
    • C. Cherniak
    • Computer Science
    • Computational models of cognition and perception
    • 1986
    • 268
    Can human irrationality be experimentally demonstrated
    • 928
    Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment
    • 182
    • PDF
    How We Know What Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life
    • 924
    • PDF
    The "conjunction fallacy" revisited : How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors
    • 373
    • PDF
    Domain-specific reasoning: Social contracts, cheating, and perspective change
    • 578
    • PDF