The “Political” philosophy of logical empiricism

  title={The “Political” philosophy of logical empiricism},
  author={W. Wick},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
  • W. Wick
  • Published 1951
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Studies
LOGICAL empiricists, of course, have no philosophy of politics beyond what they have suggested in footnotes and asides; and these say only that political questions which do not fit into the unity of science are noncognitive. But this is not my point. It is rather that logical empiricism quite explicitly is, if it does not have, what may properly be called a political or social philosophy, and that this fact is both genuinely and generally important. My discussion begins with two recent papers… Expand
Substantive Philosophy, Infallibilism and the Critique of Metaphysics: Hegel and the Historicity of Philosophical Reason
One reason for chronic misunderstanding of Hegel’s challenging and revolutionary views is that important relations between philosophy and its history are often over-simplified, not least because theExpand
Some Aspects of Empiricism and Empirical Knowledge
Though it might seem unusual to postpone a discussion of empiricism until after a discussion of Kant, there is a simple reason for doing so. Hegel himself addresses a, if not the, fundamentalExpand
From the Values of Scientific Philosophy to the Value Neutrality of the Philosophy of Science
Members of the Vienna Circle played a pivotal role in defining the work that came to be known as the philosophy of science, yet the Vienna Circle itself is now known to have had much broader concernsExpand
Hegel has been widely, though erroneously, supposed to have rejected epistemology in favor of unbridled metaphysical speculation. Reputation notwithstanding, Hegel was a very sophisticatedExpand
Is Hegel's Phenomenology Relevant to Contemporary Epistemology?
Hegel has been widely, though erroneously, supposed to have rejected epistemology in favor of unbridled metaphysical speculation. Reputation notwithstanding, Hegel was a very sophisticatedExpand
Scepticism & transcendental arguments: Some methodological reconsiderations
Kant provided two parallel, sound proofs of mental content externalism; both prove this thesis: We human beings could not think of ourselves as persisting through apparent changes in what weExpand
Philosophy today: cries of alarm and prospects of progress
Abstract Today’s critical state of philosophy is examined by considering two of its aspects: the way in which philosophy presently is ever more typically practised (increasing professionalism andExpand
Conventionalism and the Impoverishment of the Space of Reasons: Carnap, Quine and Sellars
This article examines how Quine and Sellars develop informatively contrasting responses to a fundamental tension in Carnap’s semantics ca. 1950. Quine’s philosophy could well be styled ‘Essays inExpand
Autonomy, Freedom & Embodiment: Hegel's Critique of Contemporary Biologism*
The apparent implications of the latest findings of the life sciences for our freedom and autonomy are both exciting and controversial: They undermine a common view of human freedom: a fundamentallyExpand
Rational Justification and Mutual Recognition in Substantive Domains
This paper argues that individual rational judgment, of the kind required for rational justification in empirical knowledge or morals, is in fundamental part socially and historically based, althoughExpand


De Principiis Non Disputandum
Arguments purporting to justify beliefs or evaluations often proceed from specific to more general issues. Opposition and challenge tend to provoke critical reflection; through various dialecticalExpand
Main trends in recent philosophy: two dogmas of empiricism.
M ODERN empiricism has been conditioned in large part by two dogmas. One is a belief in some fundamental cleavage between truths which are analytic, or grounded in meanings independently of mattersExpand