The "Military Revolution," 1560-1660--a Myth?

@article{Parker1976TheR,
  title={The "Military Revolution," 1560-1660--a Myth?},
  author={Geoffrey Parker},
  journal={The Journal of Modern History},
  year={1976},
  volume={48},
  pages={196 - 214}
}
  • G. Parker
  • Published 1 June 1976
  • History, Political Science
  • The Journal of Modern History
i;The sixteenth century constitutes a most uninteresting period in European military history," wrote Sir Charles Oman in 1937, and no one then dared to disagree with him. Today, however, few historians would endorse his verdict. The early modern period has come to be seen as a time of major change in warfare and military organization, as an era of "military revolution." This shift in historical perspective is mainly the work of one man: Michael Roberts, until recently Professor of History at… 
Warfare and the rise of the state
Michael Roberts’ thesis on the military revolution has inspired, or indirectly affected, virtually all work on the history of warfare of the early modern period since his celebrated inaugural lecture
The Historiography of the English State During ‘The Long Eighteenth Century’ Part Two – Fiscal‐Military and Nationalist Perspectives
This article (begun in a previous issue) reviews the four most prominent themes in the historiography of the modern English state during the last six decades, with a particular focus on ‘the long
PETER THE GREAT: THE CREATION OF THE EMPIRE
This article examines military transformations in Russia between the sixteenth and eighteenth centuries within the framework of the Military Revolution concept. This concept, introduced by the
The English-Language Military Historiography of Gustavus Adolphus in the Thirty Years' War, 1900-Present
With his ascension to the throne in 1611, following the death of his father Charles IX, Gustavus Adolphus began one of the greatest reigns of any Swedish sovereign. The military exploits of Gustavus
The development of British military professionalism through early-modern European warfare (c.1572-1637) viewed through soldiers' published literature
TLDR
The thesis thus attempts to reassess early-modern warfare by focussing on the published works of soldiers, and highlights the various types of soldier and how each type viewed his commitment to war, while it also considers the impact of published early-modem material on domestic military capability, the 'art of war', and the position of soldier-authors within the historical debate.
Western Arms in Maritime Asia in the Early Phases of Expansion
To a general reading public the history of the European empires still seems to be virtually synonymous with their military power and with stories of battles in tropical climes; by contrast, academic
“British in Thought and Deed:” Henry Bouquet and the Making of Britain’s American Empire
Peter J. Way, Advisor This work examines how Colonel Henry Bouquet used the British fiscal-military state as a blueprint for military operations in colonial North America during the Seven Years’ War
Warfare Transformed: A Braudelian Perspective on the `Revolution in Military Affairs'
Despite the historical patina of much of the extant literature, most of the scholarship on the `Revolution in Military Affairs' (RMA) reflects a profoundly superficial and ahistorical understanding
Warfare and state finance in Wodeyar Mysore, 1724-25: A missionary perspective
Mysore in the eighteenth century conjures up in the minds of Indians and Indianists an image of the state of Hyder Ali and Tipu Sultan. Yet the informal and formal reign of these two-father and
Strong Armies, Slow Adaptation: Civil-Military Relations and the Diffusion of Military Power
Why are some states more willing to adopt military innovations than others? Why, for example, were the great powers of Europe able to successfully reform their military practices to better adapt to
...
...

References

Estado moderna y mentalidad Ksocial, 2 vols. (Madrid, 1972), passim, esp
  • The Seventeenth Century