Testing the Hilbert space dimension

@inproceedings{Brunner2008TestingTH,
  title={Testing the Hilbert space dimension},
  author={Nicolas Brunner and Stefano Pironio and Antonio Ac{\'i}n and Nicolas Gisin and Andr{\'e} Allan M{\'e}thot and Valerio Scarani},
  year={2008}
}
Nicolas Brunner, Stefano Pironio, Antonio Acin, 3 Nicolas Gisin, André Allan Méthot, and Valerio Scarani Group of Applied Physics, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ICFO-Institut de Ciencies Fotoniques, Castelldefels (Barcelona), Spain ICREA-Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Spain Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, Singapore (Dated: May 9, 2008) 

Figures from this paper

How much complementarity
Bohr placed complementary bases at the mathematical centre point of his view of quantum mechanics. On the technical side then my question translates into that of classifying complex Hadamard
Tsirelson’s problem and an embedding theorem for groups arising from non-local games
Tsirelson’s problem asks whether the commuting operator model for two-party quantum correlations is equivalent to the tensor-product model. We give a negative answer to this question by showing that
Unbounded Violations of Bipartite Bell Inequalities via Operator Space Theory
In this work we show that bipartite quantum states with local Hilbert space dimension n can violate a Bell inequality by a factor of order $${{\rm \Omega} \left(\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log^2n} \right)}$$
Self-testing maximally-dimensional genuinely entangled subspaces within the stabilizer formalism
TLDR
The main aim of this work is to address the question how ‘large’ (in terms of dimension) are genuinely entangled subspaces that can be self-tested, concentrating on the multiqubit stabilizer formalism.
QBism: Quantum Theory as a Hero's Handbook
This paper represents an elaboration of the lectures delivered by one of us (CAF) during "Course 197 -- Foundations of Quantum Physics" at the International School of Physics "Enrico Fermi" in
Experimental certification of quantum dimensions and irreducible high-dimensional quantum systems with independent devices
TLDR
This work proposes a theoretical method to certify whether the generated states can be decomposed as products of lower dimensional states with the NDW, certify the dimension of the high-dimensional system, and identify whether the quantum system is irreducible in a unified picture in the authors' experiment.
Dimensionality distinguishers
TLDR
This paper generalizes the CHSH game by considering all possible non-constant Boolean functions and all possible measurement basis (up to certain precision) and constructs several equivalence classes and shows how they can be used to generate three classes of dimension distinguishers.
Parity oblivious d-level random access codes and class of noncontextuality inequalities
TLDR
This work analytically obtain classical (or equivalently preparation noncontextual) bounds on the success probability for these tasks for arbitrary d and provides for operational depiction of preparation contextuality of the ontic description underlying mixed higher dimensional quantum systems.
Graph-theoretic approach to dimension witnessing
TLDR
A novel approach to quantum dimension witnessing for scenarios with one preparation and several measurements, which uses the graphs of mutual exclusivity between sets of measurement events to identify novel quantum dimension witnesses.
Large Violation of Bell Inequalities with Low Entanglement
In this paper we obtain violations of general bipartite Bell inequalities of order $${\frac{\sqrt{n}}{\log n}}$$ with n inputs, n outputs and n-dimensional Hilbert spaces. Moreover, we construct
...
...