Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.

@article{Arnold2013TestpotentiatedLD,
  title={Test-potentiated learning: distinguishing between direct and indirect effects of tests.},
  author={Kathleen M. Arnold and Kathleen B. McDermott},
  journal={Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition},
  year={2013},
  volume={39 3},
  pages={
          940-5
        }
}
The facilitative effect of retrieval practice, or testing, on the probability of later retrieval has been the focus of much recent empirical research. A lesser known benefit of retrieval practice is that it may also enhance the ability of a learner to benefit from a subsequent restudy opportunity. This facilitative effect of retrieval practice on subsequent encoding is known as test-potentiated learning. Thus far, however, the literature has not isolated the indirect effect of retrieval… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Free recall enhances subsequent learning
TLDR
A paradigm is introduced that can measure the indirect, potentiating effect of free recall tests on subsequent learning, and a hypothesis for why tests may have this potentiate effect is tested.
Test-potentiated learning: three independent replications, a disconfirmed hypothesis, and an unexpected boundary condition
TLDR
Results replicate Arnold and McDermott (2013) by demonstrating that more versus fewer tests potentiate learning when trial time is limited and provide strong evidence against the covert retrieval hypothesis concerning why the effect occurs.
The role of retrieval type and feedback in test-potentiated new learning
This study explored the effects of retrieval and feedback on test-potentiated new learning. Participants read a text divided into three parts, between which they engaged in either episodic retrieval,
Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals
TLDR
This study focused on potential test-induced retention benefits for brief retention intervals on the order of minutes and tens of seconds in a bifurcated item-distribution model.
Does the benefit of testing depend on lag, and if so, why? Evaluating the elaborative retrieval hypothesis
TLDR
Across two experiments, final-test performance was greater following practice testing than following restudy only, and this memorial advantage was greater with long-lag than with short-lag practice testing, which provided consistent evidence for the ERH.
Filling in the gaps: using testing and restudy to promote associative learning
TLDR
The results support three primary conclusions: (1) testing aids in associative binding; (2) associativebinding is facilitated by retrieval practice and restudy pairings; and (3) pre-existing associations facilitate test-potentiation effects.
Feedback increases benefits but not costs of retrieval practice: Retrieval-induced forgetting is strength independent
We examined how the provision of feedback affected two separate effects of retrieval practice: strengthening of practiced information and forgetting of related, unpracticed information. Feedback
Reversing the testing effect by feedback: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence
TLDR
The results indicate that the reversed testing effect can arise without differential strengthening of restudied and retrieval-practiced items via feedback learning.
Neural Signatures of Test-Potentiated Learning in Parietal Cortex
TLDR
It is concluded that retrieval practice may enhance learning by promoting the recruitment of retrieval mechanisms during subsequent study opportunities by revealing striking similarities between responses in lateral parietal cortex in the present study and those in a host of studies explicitly tapping recognition memory processes.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
When and why a failed test potentiates the effectiveness of subsequent study.
TLDR
It is found that failed tests followed by immediate feedback produced greater retention than did a presentation-only condition and that generating an incorrect response to a cue both activates the semantic network associated with the cue and suppresses the correct response.
Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning.
TLDR
A compelling metacognitive illusion that occurs during self-regulated learning is identified: Once students can recall an item they tend to believe they have "learned" it, which leads students to terminate practice rather than practice retrieval, a strategy choice that ultimately results in poor retention.
Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning.
TLDR
It is demonstrated that retrieval attempts enhance future learning; it is suggested that taking challenging tests-instead of avoiding errors-may be one key to effective learning.
When and why do retrieval attempts enhance subsequent encoding?
TLDR
The results support the idea that a search set of candidates related to the retrieval cue is activated during retrieval and that this retrieval-specific activation can enhance subsequent encoding of those candidates.
Effects of Reinforcement, Neutral and Test Trials upon Paired-Associate Acquisition and Retention
3 experiments, with 185 college students, were conducted under three types of basic repetitive acquisition sequences: (1) massed condition with successive reinforcement (R) trials, (2) spaced
...
...