Ten reasons to exclude viruses from the tree of life

@article{Moreira2009TenRT,
  title={Ten reasons to exclude viruses from the tree of life},
  author={David Moreira and Purificaci{\'o}n L{\'o}pez‐Garc{\'i}a},
  journal={Nature Reviews Microbiology},
  year={2009},
  volume={7},
  pages={306-311}
}
When viruses were discovered, they were accepted as missing links between the inert world and living organisms. However, this idea was soon abandoned as information about their molecular parasitic nature accumulated. Recently, the notion that viruses are living organisms that have had a role in the evolution of some essential features of cells has experienced a renaissance owing to the discovery of unusually large and complex viruses that possess typical cellular genes. Here, we contend that… Expand

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Giant viruses in the environment: their origins and evolution.
TLDR
Giant viruses of the Phycodnaviridae and Mimiviridae families appear to share a common evolutionary ancestor with members of the nucleo-cytoplasmic large DNA viruses. Expand
Reasons to include viruses in the tree of life
TLDR
The argument that viruses should be excluded from the tree of life because they cannot sustain themselves under natural conditions does not hold and it is argued that if organisms evolved equally fast, nature would contain a lot more species of life forms. Expand
A Place for Viruses on the Tree of Life
TLDR
When deciding how, if, and where viruses should be placed on the Tree of Life, it is important that the Tree functions best as a model of biological evolution on Earth, and it isimportant that models themselves evolve with the authors' increasing understanding of biological systems. Expand
Mimivirus: the emerging paradox of quasi-autonomous viruses.
TLDR
Thanks to the recent studies on Mimivirus and other large DNA viruses, the authors are now entering a new era where the most basic concepts about viruses are revisited, including their true nature, how fundamentally different they are from cellular microorganisms, and how essential they might have been in the major innovations that punctuated the evolution of life. Expand
To be or not to be alive: How recent discoveries challenge the traditional definitions of viruses and life.
  • P. Forterre
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
  • 2016
TLDR
It is suggested that viruses have often been considered non-living, because they are traditionally assimilated to their virions, but should be considered living, because all biological entities that actively participate in the process of life are living. Expand
The origin of viruses.
TLDR
Structural analyses of capsid proteins have revealed that at least two types of virions originated independently before the LUCA (the Last Universal Cellular Ancestor), suggesting that viruses are indeed very ancient. Expand
ORIGIN OF LIFE Viruses in Biology
During the first half of the twentieth century, many scientists considered viruses the smallest living entities and primitive life forms somehow placed between the inert world and highly evolvedExpand
The place of viruses in biology in light of the metabolism- versus-replication-first debate.
TLDR
The debates about whether viruses are alive or not and whether some virus-like replicators preceded the first cells fall under the long-lasting dichotomous view on the nature and origin of life (metabolism- versus replication-first), the claim that some giant viruses form a fourth domain in an organismal tree of life is not consistent with current evidence and can be falsified. Expand
The Origin and Evolution of Viruses as Molecular Organisms
TLDR
An alternative view about the nature of viruses based on their properties during the intracellular stage of their life cycle is presented, when viruses express features comparable to those of many parasitic cellular species, and several parasites that are currently classified as cellular organisms are in fact genuine molecular organisms. Expand
Viruses in Biology
TLDR
This article argues that the claim that viruses form a fourth domain in the tree of life can be solidly refuted by proper molecular phylogenetic analyses and needs to be removed from this debate. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 76 REFERENCES
What does structure tell us about virus evolution?
TLDR
Structural analyses of virion architecture and coat protein topology have revealed unexpected similarities, not visible in sequence comparisons, suggesting a common origin for viruses that infect hosts residing in different domains of life (bacteria, archaea and eukarya). Expand
Giant viruses, giant chimeras: The multiple evolutionary histories of Mimivirus genes
TLDR
The large number of genes acquired by Mimivirus from eukaryotic and bacterial sources suggests that HGT has been an important process in the evolution of its genome and the adaptation to parasitism. Expand
The origin of viruses and their possible roles in major evolutionary transitions.
TLDR
According to these new hypotheses, viruses played a critical role in major evolutionary transitions, such as the invention of DNA and DNA replication mechanisms, the formation of the three domains of life, or else, the origin of the eukaryotic nucleus. Expand
Nature of Viruses
TLDR
It is clear that viruses, although they are biological systems, are not living microorganisms and they lack the characteristic autonomy that arises from the presence of integrated, metabolic activities. Expand
The ancient Virus World and evolution of cells
TLDR
The existence of several genes that are central to virus replication and structure, are shared by a broad variety of viruses but are missing from cellular genomes suggests the model of an ancient virus world, a flow of virus-specific genes that went uninterrupted from the precellular stage of life's evolution to this day. Expand
Redefining viruses: lessons from Mimivirus
TLDR
A new definition for a virus is proposed — a capsid-encoding organism that is composed of proteins and nucleic acids, self-assembles in a nucleocapsid and uses a ribosome-encoded organism for the completion of its life cycle. Expand
Does common architecture reveal a viral lineage spanning all three domains of life?
TLDR
It is proposed that the occurrence of a double-barrel trimer coat protein in an icosahedral dsDNA virus with large facets, irrespective of its host, is a very strong indicator of its membership in a lineage of viruses with a common ancestor. Expand
Viruses take center stage in cellular evolution
The origins of viruses are shrouded in mystery, but advances in genomics and the discovery of highly complex giant DNA viruses have stimulated new hypotheses that DNA viruses were involved in theExpand
Three RNA cells for ribosomal lineages and three DNA viruses to replicate their genomes: a hypothesis for the origin of cellular domain.
  • P. Forterre
  • Biology, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 2006
TLDR
This work explores the possibility that three such independent transfers were at the origin of Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya, respectively, and explains why each domain has its specific DNA replication apparatus. Expand
Modification of intracellular membrane structures for virus replication
TLDR
How viruses modify intracellular membranes is described, similarities between the structures that are induced by viruses of different families are highlighted and how these structures could be formed are discussed. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...