Ten Things Political Scientists Know that You Don't

  title={Ten Things Political Scientists Know that You Don't},
  author={Hans Noel},
  journal={The Forum},
  • H. Noel
  • Published 2010
  • Political Science
  • The Forum
Many political scientists would like journalists and political practitioners to take political science more seriously, and many are beginning to pay attention. This paper outlines ten things that political science scholarship has learned that are at odds with much of the conventional wisdom of American politics. 

Figures from this paper

Scientific Literacy in Undergraduate Political Science Education: The Current State of Affairs, an Agenda for Action, and Proposed Fundamental Benchmarks
ABSTRACT Political science is falling behind a broad movement in the United States that seeks to reform the teaching of scientific literacy in undergraduate education. Indeed, political science isExpand
Investigating American Democracy: Is Political Science Superior to Journalism?
  • J. Maloy
  • Political Science
  • Perspectives on Politics
  • 2017
M embers of the academic profession of political science may notice some eerily familiar feelings of anxiety as they read James T. Hamilton’s book about investigative journalism. The lingeringExpand
Political Realism as Anti-scholastic Practice: Methodological Lessons from Muckraking Journalism
  • J. Maloy
  • Political Science
  • Political Research Quarterly
  • 2019
What does the trend of “realism” in political theory portend, if anything, for how social and political scientists do their work? We can best see where realism’s rubber hits the road by re-examiningExpand
Voting vs. Thinking: Unified Partisan Voting Does Not Imply Unified Partisan Beliefs
Abstract The Myth of the Independent Voter crystallized views that were becoming accepted in political science and began an effort to convince the press that self-described independent voters wereExpand
Democratic Legitimacy and the Consequences of Compulsion
In this chapter, I examine and undermine two sets of arguments for compulsory voting. The first set of arguments concerns ideas about democratic legitimacy. The second set of arguments claimsExpand
Institutional Change and the Presidential Mandate
Often treated as a unified concept with a single definition, the presidential mandate actually encompasses multiple definitions, each connected to distinct ideas about democracy and presidentialExpand
Understanding and influencing the policy process
This essay translates some of the underlying logic of existing research of policy processes into a set of strategies for shaping policy agendas and influencing policy development and change. TheExpand
U.S. Domestic Politics and International Political Economy: An Introduction to the Special Issue
The articles in this special issue of Business and Politics weigh in on the domestic political dynamics that continue to shape the international political economy, with a focus on the United StatesExpand
Compulsory Voting: For and Against
Part I. Medicine Worse than Disease? Against Compulsory Voting Jason Brennan: 1. The heavy burden of proof 2. Democratic legitimacy and the consequences of compulsion 3. Do your share or else 4.Expand
Congressional Conquest: Examining Factors Affecting Legislative Triumph
Because Congress maintains a reputation as the most powerful branch of our federal government in the policymaking process, it is crucial that we understand the ins and outs of these procedures thatExpand


An Economic Theory of Democracy
Downs presents a rational calculus of voting that has inspired much of the later work on voting and turnout. Particularly significant was his conclusion that a rational voter should almost neverExpand
Presidential Vote Models: A Recount
Was it Al Gore's election to lose? Most political scientists, includeing us, believed that peace and a booming economy would give Gore a significant advantage in the 2000 presidential race. TheExpand
Mandate Politics
  • J. Peake
  • Political Science
  • The Journal of Politics
  • 2007
analytical and theoretical traditions of the pluralists, and he weaves a compelling narrative of scholarly progress around a theory of political process. Unlike Virginia Gray and David Lowery (2004),Expand
Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management
Introduction 1. Explaining party position change: theory and method 2. Coalition maintenance: the politics of trade policy 3. Coalition group incorporation: the politics of abortion and gun controlExpand
The Two-party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science
Science involves the accumulation of knowledge, which means not only the formulation of new sentences about discoveries but also the reformulation of empirically falsified or theoreticallyExpand
Electoral Mandates in American Politics
Political science has not come to terms with the idea of electoral mandates. The discipline's view is a hodgepodge of competing claims. In this article we review the empirical issues about mandatesExpand
Reaching beyond race
If white Americans could reveal what they really thought about race, without the risk of appearing racist, what would they say? This book aims to illustrate aspects of white American thinking aboutExpand
News That Matters: Television and American Opinion
Almost twenty-five years ago, Shanto Iyengar and Donald R. Kinder first documented a series of sophisticated and innovative experiments that unobtrusively altered the order and emphasis of newsExpand
No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures
The new political machines fuel partisanship by supporting only candidates who follow the party's agenda. Despite concerns about the debilitating effects of partisanship on democratic government, inExpand
The Myth of the Independent Voter
Few events in American politics over the past two decades have generated more attention than the increasing number of voters calling themselves Independent. By the early 1970s IndependentsExpand