Technology vs. science: The cognitive fallacy

@article{NucciPearce2004TechnologyVS,
  title={Technology vs. science: The cognitive fallacy},
  author={Maria Rosaria Nucci Pearce and David Pearce},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2004},
  volume={81},
  pages={405-419}
}
There are fundamental differences between the explanation of scientific change and the explanation of technological change. The differences arise from fundamental differences between scientific and technological knowledge and basic disanalogies between technological advance and scientific progress. Given the influence of economic markets and industrial and institutional structures on the development of technology, it is more plausible to regard technological change as a continuous and… 
6 Citations

Psychology Between Science and Technology: A Proposal for the Development of a Theory of Practice

Over the course of time, a fundamental methodological dissent about the borders and features of psychology has developed. One of the main roots of this dissent may be found in the dispute over the

Legal Science: The Demarcation Problem and the Perimeter of “Good Science”

  • David Duarte
  • Law
    Legal Interpretation and Scientific Knowledge
  • 2019
The scientificity of legal science depends both on a correct definition of which are its tasks and on the grade of compliance with demarcation criteria. With the former, legal science can be

Some Methodological Issues for Intelligent Information Systems

It is argued that each of these areas may provide useful tools for the methodology of IIS, including instruments for analysing and evaluating success and progress, and to develop adequate methodological tools for IIS.

Experts and Politics in the German Nuclear Waste Governance

This chapter provides a comparative analysis of the work of selected commissions appointed in Germany over the last 40 years to advise the Parliament or ministries in matters concerning nuclear waste

Rolle und Entwicklung politischer Beratungs- und Begleitgremien nach dem Konzept des Science-Policy Interfaces

Zusammenfassung In diesemBeitragwird eine vergleichende Analyse der Arbeit ausgewählter Kommissionen und Beratungsgremien in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland vorgenommen. Betrachtet werden Kommissionen

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 18 REFERENCES

Cognitive Change in Technology and Science

The central presupposition of this paper is that cognitive change in technology is the result of the purposeful problem-solving activities of the members of relatively small communities of

The nature of technological knowledge: are models of scientific change relevant?

Communities and Hierarchies: Structure in the Practice of Science and Technology.- Paradigms, Revolutions, and Technology.- Organizational Aspects of Technological Change.- Cognitive Change in

Remarks on Technological Progress

Perhaps the most fundamental question of the new philosophy of technology is whether science and technology have to be conceptually distinguished from each other.1 If technology were just a branch of

The Direction of Technological Change: Inducement Mechanisms and Focusing Devices

  • N. Rosenberg
  • Education
    Economic Development and Cultural Change
  • 1969
Introduction One of the things which is perfectly obvious about societies which have achieved high degrees of industrialization is that they have acquired unusual skills in problem-solving

The Structure of Thinking in Technology

Inquiry into the philosophy of technology, due to the infancy of the subject, must start with some reflections on what technology itself is. There is at present a tendency to identify technology with

Technology and Natural Science — A Methodological Investigation

As a first step in an attempt to delimit natural sciences and technology it would seem sensible to consider the original meaning of the two words. The term ‘natural sciences’ would thus denote the

Inside the black box

Economists have long treated technological phenomena as events transpiring inside a black box and, on the whole, have adhered rather strictly to a self-imposed ordinance not to inquire too seriously