Taxonomy and Philosophy of Names

@article{Hrlin1998TaxonomyAP,
  title={Taxonomy and Philosophy of Names},
  author={M. H{\"a}rlin and P. Sundberg},
  journal={Biology and Philosophy},
  year={1998},
  volume={13},
  pages={233-244}
}
Although naming biological clades is a major activity in taxonomy, little attention has been paid to what these names actually refer to. In philosophy, definite descriptions have long been considered equivalent to the meaning of names and biological taxonomy is a scientific application of these ideas. One problem with definite descriptions as the meanings of names is that the name will refer to whatever fits the description rather than the intended individual (clade). Recent proposals for… Expand
Taxonomic names and phylogenetic trees
This paper addresses the issue of philosophy of names within the context of biological taxonomy, more specifically how names refer. By contrasting two philosophies of names, one that is based on theExpand
Phylogenetic hypotheses, taxonomic sameness and the reference of taxon names
TLDR
It is argued that a taxon name does not primarily refer to a single clade that somehow mirror the reality of branches in the tree of life, and it is suggested that aTaxon name refers to a set, or natural kind, of counterfactual and reconstructed clades. Expand
Biological taxon names are descriptive names
TLDR
An alternative account of reference for biological nomenclature in which taxon names are understood as descriptive names is argued, using the ‘DN account’ to focus on the debate between Matt Haber and Joeri Witteveen concerning misidentification of type specimens, misapplication of names, and the truth conditions of Joseph LaPorte’s de dicto necessary sentence. Expand
Taxon names as paradigms: the structure of nomenclatural revolutions
In the present paper I argue that the two systems of phylogenetic nomenclature hitherto proposed represent, in a generalized sense, two different philosophies for how science develops and progresses.Expand
A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue?
TLDR
It is argued that the form of taxonomic freedom inherent in phylogenetic nomenclature is appropriate to phylogenetic taxonomy, in which taxa are considered historical entities that are discovered through phylogenetic analysis and are not human constructs. Expand
The PhyloCode: a critical discussion of its theoretical foundation
TLDR
It is shown that the thesis of “rigid designation” if deployed in taxonomy introduces a new essentialism into systematics, which is exactly what the PhyloCode was designed to avoid. Expand
Proposal of an integrated framework of biological taxonomy: a phylogenetic taxonomy, with the method of using names with standard endings in clade nomenclature
TLDR
An integrated framework of biological taxonomy is proposed, in which the advantages of phylogenetic taxonomy and traditional, Linnaean nomenclature, together with the temporal banding methods are synthesized, without deteriorating the strength of theoretical coherence. Expand
Should taxon names be explicitly defined?
TLDR
The current system of nomenclature is better able to handle new and unexpected changes in ideas about taxonomic relationships, and greater flexibility in the names themselves makes the current system better designed for use by all users of taxon names. Expand
Ceci n'est pas une pipe: names, clades and phylogenetic nomenclature
TLDR
It is argued that taxon names under the Linnaean system are unclear in meaning and provide unstable group–name associations, notwithstanding whether or not there are agreements on relationships, and that species should not be recognized as taxonomic units. Expand
On the relationship between content, ancestor, and ancestry in phylogenetic nomenclature
In this paper I draw attention to the concepts of content and ancestry in phylogenetic nomenclature. I argue that these concepts are tightly linked and that they cannot be separated as suggested byExpand
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES
Phylogenetic classification and the definition of taxon names
TLDR
The Linnean categories are considered poorly suited to convey the information in evolutionary trees, and it is suggested that these categories are abandoned. Expand
Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon Names
Defining the names of taxa in terms of common ancestry, that is, using phylogenetic definitions of taxon names, departs from a tradition of character-based definitions by granting the concept ofExpand
Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy
TLDR
It is shown that the names of individuals (composite wholes) can be defined in terms of necessary and sufficient properties provides the foundation for a synthesis of seemingly incompatible positions held by contemporary individualists and essentialists concerning the nature of taxa and the definitions of taxon names. Expand
The definitions of species and clade names: A reply to Ghiselin
TLDR
It is argued that the definitions of species and clade names are indeed stated in terms of defining properties, and that Ghiselin's conclusion concerning the irreconcilability of traditional and individualist views is based on a misinterpretation of what are the defining properties. Expand
Replacement of an Essentialistic Perspective on Taxonomic Definitions as Exemplified by the Definition of “Mammalia”
TLDR
The replacement of an essentialistic perspective on the definitions of "Mam? malia" and other taxon names by a more nominalistic one is associated with the development of a phylogenetic perspective on biological nomenclature and represents an important step in theDevelopment of a more broadly scientific approach to that subject. Expand
EXPLICITNESS, STABILITY, AND UNIVERSALITY IN THE PHYLOGENETIC DEFINITION AND USAGE OF TAXON NAMES: A CASE STUDY OF THE PHYLOGENETIC TAXONOMY OF THE CARNIVORA (MAMMALIA)
TLDR
Conventions can promote universality in the formation, definition, and usage of taxon names in phylogenetic taxonomy and help to promote the ac- ceptance of phylogeneticTaxonomy by biologists. Expand
Phylogenetic taxonomy–some comments
TLDR
Some of the practical issues in a phylogenetic taxonomy are focused on, and some alternative solutions to problems acknowledged in previous papers are suggested. Expand
Toward a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature.
TLDR
The development of a phylogenetic system of nomenclature requires reformulating these concepts and principles so that they are no longer based on the Linnean categories but on the tenet of common descent. Expand
The metaphysics of evolution
Extreme variation in the meaning of the term “species” throughout the history of biology has often frustrated attempts of historians, philosophers and biologists to communicate with one another aboutExpand
Proper names and identifying descriptions
There is an extremely plausible principle about proper names that many philosophers up to the present have either assumed or argued for. I will call it the ‘principle of identifying descriptions’.Expand
...
1
2
3
...