Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia

@article{Vigas2007TalkBY,
  title={Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia},
  author={Fernanda B. Vi{\'e}gas and Martin Wattenberg and Jesse Kriss and Frank van Ham},
  journal={2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07)},
  year={2007},
  pages={78-78}
}
Wikipedia, the online encyclopedia, has attracted attention both because of its popularity and its unconventional policy of letting anyone on the Internet edit its articles. This paper describes the results of an empirical analysis of Wikipedia and discusses ways in which the Wikipedia community has evolved as it has grown. We contrast our findings with an earlier study and present three main results. First, the community maintains a strong resilience to malicious editing, despite tremendous… 
Cooperation and quality in wikipedia
TLDR
It is shown that Wikipedia articles accrete edits according to a simple stochastic mechanism in which edits beget edits, and Topics of high interest or relevance are thus naturally brought to the forefront of quality.
Social networks of Wikipedia
TLDR
This paper proposes different algorithms for extraction of conversations from Wikipedia conversations and empirically validate the differences in the networks they generate on the Venetian Wikipedia with the real network of conversations extracted manually by coding every message left on all user talk pages.
Coordination and Division of Labor in Open Content Communities: The Role of Template Messages in Wikipedia
TLDR
It is found that intensity of editing increases immediately after the "NPOV" template appears and that controversies about articles which have received the attention of a more limited group of editors before they were tagged as controversial have a lower chance to be treated quickly.
When the levee breaks: without bots, what happens to Wikipedia's quality control processes?
TLDR
This paper uses periods of breakdown in ClueBot NG as naturalistic experiments to study Wikipedia's heterogeneous quality control network, which is analyzed as a multi-tiered system in which distinct classes of reviewers use various reviewing technologies to patrol for different kinds of damage at staggered time periods.
Revision and Co-revision in Wikipedia : Detecting Clusters of Interest
TLDR
This paper analyzes another network that arises from the fact that Wikipedia articles undergo perpetual edit- ing, the co-revision network, to assess the meaningfulness of it and to determine dierences between it and other relations on Wikipedia pages, such as similarity by author-overlap.
The Collaborative Redesign of Wikipedia
TLDR
Templates have given rise to the transformation of its original content management system into something that more closely resembles an environment for social networking, and made possible a form of participatory design that is extremely responsive to the needs of its participants.
Harnessing the wisdom of crowds in wikipedia: quality through coordination
TLDR
Examination of how the number of editors in Wikipedia and the coordination methods they use affect article quality demonstrated the critical importance of coordination in effectively harnessing the "wisdom of the crowd" in online production environments.
Wikipedians are born, not made: a study of power editors on Wikipedia
TLDR
The results suggest a design opportunity: customizing the initial user experience to improve retention and channel new users' intense energy over the course of their career.
Managing conflicts between users in Wikipedia
TLDR
This article sets up a users typology according to their involvement in conflicts and their publishing and management activity in the encyclopedia, and describes users behavior in contributing to articles that are tagged by the wikipedian community as being in conflict with the official guidelines of Wikipedia, or conversely as being well featured.
Using Metadata Signals to Support Stigmergy
TLDR
Based on an empirical analysis of two types of signals in Wikipedia, namely the “unsimple” and “NPOV” templates, mixed evidence is provided to support the effectiveness of stigmergic metadata signals.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES
Measuring Wikipedia
TLDR
A first overview and outlook on Wikipedia research is given because Wikipedia is particularly interesting to cybermetric research because of the richness of phenomena and because its data is fully accessible.
Wikipedia as Participatory Journalism: Reliable Sources? Metrics for evaluating collaborative media as a news resource
TLDR
This study examines the growth of Wikipedia and analyzes the crucial technologies and community policies that have enabled the project to prosper, and establishes a set of metrics based on established encyclopedia taxonomies and analyzed the trends in Wikipedia being used as a source.
Coase's Penguin, or Linux and the Nature of the Firm
TLDR
It is suggested that the authors are seeing the broad and deep emergence of a new, third mode of production in the digitally networked environment, a mode I call commons-based peer production, which has systematic advantages over markets and managerial hierarchies when the object of production is information or culture.
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations
TLDR
This paper investigates the dynamics of Wikipedia, a prominent, thriving wiki, and focuses on the relevance of authorship, the value of community surveillance in ameliorating antisocial behavior, and how authors with competing perspectives negotiate their differences.
Collaborative Authoring on the Web: A Genre Analysis of Online Encyclopedias
  • Will Emigh, S. Herring
  • Computer Science
    Proceedings of the 38th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences
  • 2005
TLDR
A genre analysis of two web-based collaborative authoring environments, Wikipedia and Everything2, shows that the greater the degree of post-production editorial control afforded by the system, the more formal and standardized the language of the collaboratively-authored documents becomes, analogous to that found in traditional print encyclopedias.
Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia
TLDR
This descriptive study uses two perspectives on social activity to understand the experiences of individuals who became active collaborators in Wikipedia, a prolific, cooperatively-authored online encyclopedia and suggests a new paradigm for collaborative systems.
INFORMATION QUALITY DISCUSSIONS IN WIKIPEDIA
TLDR
Analysis of the discussion pages and other process-oriented pages within the Wikipedia project helps in understanding how high quality is maintained in a project where anyone may participate with no prior vetting.
Internet encyclopaedias go head to head
Jimmy Wales' Wikipedia comes close to Britannica in terms of the accuracy of its science entries, a Nature investigation finds.  UPDATE: see details of how the data were collected for this article in
Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors
TLDR
A novel analysis and visualization of English Wikipedia data is presented, targeting the analysis of basic statistics, the identification of the semantic structure and the age of the categories in this free online encyclopedia, and the content coverage of its highly productive authors.
Managing the virtual commons : Cooperation and conflict in computer communities
Les As. examinent le probleme de l'utilisation libre des messages electroniques et de l'aptitude d'un groupe social a surmonter ce probleme. Ils appliquent la logique des dilemmes sociaux a une
...
1
2
...