Taking up the mop: identifying future wikipedia administrators

@article{Burke2008TakingUT,
  title={Taking up the mop: identifying future wikipedia administrators},
  author={Moira Burke and Robert E. Kraut},
  journal={CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems},
  year={2008}
}
  • Moira Burke, R. Kraut
  • Published 5 April 2008
  • Computer Science
  • CHI '08 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
As Wikipedia grows, so do the messy byproducts of collaboration. Backlogs of administrative work are increasing, suggesting the need for more users with privileged admin status. This paper presents a model of editors who have successfully passed the peer review process to become admins. The lightweight model is based on behavioral metadata and comments, and does not require any page text. It demonstrates that the Wikipedia community has shifted in the last two years to prioritizing policymaking… 

Tables from this paper

Collaborative Sensemaking during Admin Permission Granting in Wikipedia
TLDR
The results of an exploratory study of how members of the Wikipedia community engage in collaborative sensemaking when deciding which members to advance to admin status are reported.
Does the Administrator Community of Polish Wikipedia Shut out New Candidates Because of the Acquaintance Relation
TLDR
Whether administrator community of Polish Wikipedia shuts out new candidates because of the acquaintance relation is answered, by the annual analysis of obtained statistics and examination of clustering coefficient as an approximation of social capital.
Implementation and Evaluation of a Framework to calculate Impact Measures for Wikipedia Authors
TLDR
An open source framework to calculate Wikipedia authors by calculating impact measures based on the edit history is implemented in a distributed way (MapReduce) and its performance on various sized datasets is evaluated.
Social Mechanism of Granting Trust Basing on Polish Wikipedia Requests for Adminship
TLDR
Research about Polish Wikipedia administrators and their behavior during Request for Adminship votings is described and social aspects of deciding about granting and revoking administrative permissions becomes relevant for the sustained growth of Wikipedia.
Exploring Wikipedia: Identifying productive editor behavior in collaborative systems
TLDR
It is shown that it is possible for Wikipedians across broad levels of experience to distinguish between behaviors exhibited by administrators versus non-administrators, allowing for an immediate and objective evaluation of editor behaviors.
Modeling Wikipedia admin elections using multidimensional behavioral social networks
TLDR
This work model the admin elections using multidimensional behavioral social networks derived from the Wikipedia edit history, and finds that one of the dimensions, based on discussion on Wikipedia talk pages, can be validly interpreted as acquaintance among editors, and discusses the relevance of this dimension to the admins elections.
Bots in Wikipedia: Unfolding their duties
TLDR
To what extent human and machine intelligence is combined to carry out semi-automatic workflows of complex tasks in Wikipedia is revealed and insights that suggest general reasons, why Wikipedia’s editor community uses bots as well as approaches are revealed.
Revisiting Request for Adminship (RfA) within Wikipedia: How Do User Contributions Instill Community Trust?
TLDR
This study examines the impact of different forms of contribution made by adminship candidates on the community's overall decision as to whether to promote the candidate to administrator and supports the role of total contribution, and clarification of contribution in RFA success.
Using edit sessions to measure participation in wikipedia
TLDR
A pattern of punctuated bursts in editors' activity that is identified through an analysis of Wikipedia log data is identified, and a metric is built that approximates the labor hours of editors in the encyclopedia.
Wisdom of the crowd or technicity of content? Wikipedia as a sociotechnical system
TLDR
This article analyses the sociotechnical system — the intricate collaboration between human users and automated content agents — that defines Wikipedia as a knowledge instrument.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 17 REFERENCES
SuggestBot: using intelligent task routing to help people find work in wikipedia
TLDR
SuggestBot, software that performs intelligent task routing (matching people with tasks) in Wikipedia using broadly applicable strategies of text analysis, collaborative filtering, and hyperlink following to recommend tasks is presented.
Don't look now, but we've created a bureaucracy: the nature and roles of policies and rules in wikipedia
TLDR
This descriptive study draws on prior work on rules and policies in organizations to propose and apply a conceptual framework for understanding the natures and roles of policies in Wikipedia and concludes that wikis are capable of supporting a broader range of structures and activities than other collaborative platforms.
Talk Before You Type: Coordination in Wikipedia
TLDR
The results suggest that despite the potential for anarchy, the Wikipedia community places a strong emphasis on group coordination, policy, and process.
Creating, destroying, and restoring value in wikipedia
TLDR
The notion of the impact of an edit, measured by the number of times the edited version is viewed, is introduced, and it is shown that an overwhelming majority of the viewed words were written by frequent editors and that this majority is increasing.
He says, she says: conflict and coordination in Wikipedia
TLDR
The growth of non-direct work in Wikipedia is examined and the development of tools to characterize conflict and coordination costs in Wikipedia are described, which may inform the design of new collaborative knowledge systems.
Scaling Consensus: Increasing Decentralization in Wikipedia Governance
  • Andrea Forte, A. Bruckman
  • Sociology
    Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008)
  • 2008
TLDR
Wikipedia is described as an organization with highly refined policies, norms, and a technological architecture that supports organizational ideals of consensus building and discussion and how governance in the site is becoming increasingly decentralized as the community grows.
Power of the Few vs . Wisdom of the Crowd : Wikipedia and the Rise of the Bourgeoisie
TLDR
Although Wikipedia was driven by the influence of “elite” users early on, more recently there has been a dramatic shift in workload to the “common” user, and this is shown in del.icio.us, a very different type of social collaborative knowledge system.
Studying cooperation and conflict between authors with history flow visualizations
TLDR
This paper investigates the dynamics of Wikipedia, a prominent, thriving wiki, and focuses on the relevance of authorship, the value of community surveillance in ameliorating antisocial behavior, and how authors with competing perspectives negotiate their differences.
Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration.
Social loafing is the tendency for individuals to expend less effort when working collectively than when working individually. A meta-analysis of 78 studies demonstrates that social loafing is robust
Capturing Rater Policies in Evaluating Candidates for Promotion
Five criteria for evaluating candidates for promotion were investigated in a policy capturing study using manager and student samples. Six clusters of rater policies were observed which indicated t...
...
1
2
...