Taking Gender Seriously in Philosophy of Science

@article{Longino1992TakingGS,
  title={Taking Gender Seriously in Philosophy of Science},
  author={Helen E. Longino},
  journal={PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association},
  year={1992},
  volume={1992},
  pages={333 - 340}
}
  • H. Longino
  • Published 1 January 1992
  • Philosophy
  • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
Using the author's social analysis of scientific knowledge, two ways of understanding the importance of gender to the philosophy of science are offered. Given a requirement of openness to multiple critical perspectives, the gender, race and class structure of a scientific community are an important ingredient of its epistemic reliability. Secondly, one can ask whether a gender sensitive scientific community might prefer certain evaluative criteria (or virtues of theory or practice) to others… 

The open end: Social naturalism, feminist values and the integrity of epistemology

Increasing numbers of epistemologists and philosophers of science consider themselves naturalists, and naturalists come in many different forms; but most common in the recent upswell are

Whose STEM? Disrupting the Gender Crisis Within STEM

This article challenges implicit understandings of scientific inquiry and gender within contemporary responses to the underrepresentation of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics

The role of the appeal to the transcendent in scholarly discourse on the plausibility of the value-free ideal in scientific inquiry

This thesis shows how the appeal to the transcendent characterizes aspects of the debate amongst leading contemporary philosophers of science regarding the value-free ideal and the attendant aim of

Situated Neuroscience: Exploring Biologies of Diversity

From the late 1980s to the late 1990s there was concentrated activity around feminist philosophy of science and the question: could there be a feminist science? (Richardson 2008). Early feminist

(re)Producing mtEve.

  • Marina DiMarco
  • Biology
    Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
  • 2020

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 16 REFERENCES

Uncovering Gynocentric Science

Feminist philosophers of science have produced an exciting array of works in the last several years, from critiques of androcentrism in traditional science to theories about what might constitute

Hand, Brain, and Heart: A Feminist Epistemology for the Natural Sciences

  • H. Rose
  • Art
    Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society
  • 1983
ion of scientific practice as it has developed under capitalism and patriarchy, on one hand, is in painful contradiction with her caring labor, on the other. As Ruth Wallsgrove writes, "A woman,

Observational study of behavior: sampling methods.

TLDR
Seven major types of sampling for observational studies of social behavior have been found in the literature and the major strengths and weaknesses of each method are pointed out.

Myths of gender

Female Choices: Sexual Behaviour of Female Primates.By Meredith F. Small. Cornell University Press: 1993. Pp. 245. $26.95.The Lemurs' Legacy: Evolution of Power, Sex, and Love.By Robert Jay Russell.

THE PROMISES OF MONSTERS:

> coming up to me, nts about me: "bell vs a lack of under­ ) raise. I wanted to I am excited about when I felt that I as terror about the ,exual practice. and ld I felt bad because e microphones and

Sex hormones and human behavior: a critique of the linear model.

TLDR
Examining three areas of hormone-behavior research in humans, the authors argue that the form of explanation is inappropriate to the behavioral phenomena being explained and urges the adoption of a more complex neurobiological approach that emphasizes the role of the cerebral cortex and correlatively minimizes therole of fetal hormones.

Values, Objectivity, and Theory Choice" in The Essential Tension

  • 1977

Science and Gender

  • R. Bleier
  • Education
    Solar Impact: Climate and the Sun
  • 2020

Science as Social Knowledge