Taint analysis of the Bitcoin network
@article{Hercog2019TaintAO, title={Taint analysis of the Bitcoin network}, author={Uros Hercog and Andraz Povse}, journal={ArXiv}, year={2019}, volume={abs/1907.01538} }
Determining the trust of an individual Bitcoin wallet is a difficult problem. There are no ratings, that offer vendors or exchanges meaningful information about the level of the taint of Bitcoins they are receiving. Lack of such information places exchanges liable in an event when the received Bitcoins are stolen or ill-gotten. In this paper, we try to solve this problem by introducing a Bitcoin address taint score called TaintRank. It provides insight into a specific wallet by taking the…
Figures and Tables from this paper
2 Citations
Towards Deanonymization of Mixing Services in Bitcoin
- Computer Science, Mathematics
- 2022
This paper plans to introduce two novel heuristics, including HOLO which aims to taint bitcoin addresses in reference to a fixed output and an OI heuristic designed to parse blockchain data in a way where the authors only receive information they deem is of interest.
Analysis of Cryptocurrency Transactions from a Network Perspective: An Overview
- Computer ScienceJ. Netw. Comput. Appl.
- 2021
References
SHOWING 1-9 OF 9 REFERENCES
An inquiry into money laundering tools in the Bitcoin ecosystem
- Computer Science2013 APWG eCrime Researchers Summit
- 2013
A first systematic account of opportunities and limitations of anti-money laundering (AML) in Bitcoin, a decentralized cryptographic currency proliferating on the Internet, is provided and it appears unlikely that a Know-Your-Customer principle can be enforced in the Bitcoin system.
An Analysis of Anonymity in the Bitcoin System
- Computer Science, Mathematics2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Privacy, Security, Risk and Trust and 2011 IEEE Third Int'l Conference on Social Computing
- 2011
It is shown that the two networks derived from Bitcoin's public transaction history have a non-trivial topological structure, provide complementary views of the Bit coin system and have implications for anonymity.
BitIodine: Extracting Intelligence from the Bitcoin Network
- Computer ScienceFinancial Cryptography
- 2014
A modular framework, BitIodine, which parses the blockchain, clusters addresses that are likely to belong to a same user or group of users, classifies such users and labels them, and finally visualizes complex information extracted from the Bitcoin network is presented.
An Analysis of Bitcoin Laundry Services
- Computer ScienceNordSec
- 2017
Examination of some of the most relevant Bitcoin Laundry Services, commonly known as tumblers or mixers, and studies their main features to try to answer some fundamental questions including their security, popularity, transaction volume, and generated revenue.
A Fistful of Bitcoins Characterizing Payments Among Men with No Names
- Computer Science
- 2013
This research includes work on anonymous communication systems, cyber-physical security, e-crime, and wireless privacy, as well as computer systems, networking, and security.
Bitcoin money laundering: mixed results?: An explorative study on money laundering of cybercrime proceeds using bitcoin
- Business
- 2018
Purpose: This paper aims to shed light into money laundering using bitcoin. Digital payment methods are increasingly used by criminals to launder money obtained through cybercrime. As many forms of…
Anonymous CoinJoin Transactions with Arbitrary Values
- Computer Science, Mathematics2017 IEEE Trustcom/BigDataSE/ICESS
- 2017
A model for CoinJoin transactions is defined and it is shown that with differing, representative amounts they generally do not provide any significant anonymity gains, and an output splitting approach is presented that introduces sufficient ambiguity to effectively prevent linking in Coin join transactions.
DebtRank: Too Central to Fail? Financial Networks, the FED and Systemic Risk
- EconomicsScientific Reports
- 2012
DebtRank, a novel measure of systemic impact inspired by feedback-centrality, is introduced, finding that a group of 22 institutions, which received most of the funds, form a strongly connected graph where each of the nodes becomes systemically important at the peak of the crisis.
Bitcoin anomalies analysis
- 2018