Corpus ID: 15300891

TWO DIMENSIONS OF UNCERTAINTY

@inproceedings{Fox2011TWODO,
  title={TWO DIMENSIONS OF UNCERTAINTY},
  author={C. Fox and GUlden Ulkiimen},
  year={2011}
}
Barack Obama made one of the most difficult decisions of his presidency: launch an attack on a compound in Pakistan that intelligence agents suspected was the home of Osama bin Laden. In an interview Obama described the raid as the longest 40 minutes of his life. He attributed that tension to two sources. First, he was not certain that bin Laden was actually residing in the compound. ''As outstanding a job as our intelligence teams did:' said the President, ''At the end of the day, this was… Expand
1 Citations

Figures and Tables from this paper

Distinguishing Two Dimensions of Uncertainty

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 55 REFERENCES
    Prediction and postdiction preferences in guessing
    In three studies, it is shown that most subjects when asked to guess the outcome of an uncertain event (a die toss, the sex of a child, the winner of a match) will prefer to do so before the event.Expand
    The Unfinished Game: Pascal, Fermat, and the Seventeenth-Century Letter that Made the World Modern
    TLDR
    From insurance rates, to housing and job markets, to the safety of cars and planes, calculating probabilities allowed people, for the first time, to think rationally about how future events might unfold. Expand
    Hindsight and Causality
    When people know how an event turned out, they are usually unable to reproduce the judgments they would have made without outcome knowledge. Furthermore, they are unaware of their inability toExpand
    Partition Priming in Judgment Under Uncertainty
    TLDR
    It is shown that likelihood judgments are biased toward an ignorance-prior probability that assigns equal credence to each mutually exclusive event considered by the judge, and systematic partition dependence is observed. Expand
    How people cope with uncertainty due to chance or deception
    In making social judgments people process effects caused by humans differently from effects caused by non-human agencies. We assume that when they have to predict outcomes that are attributed toExpand
    Extensional Versus Intuitive Reasoning: The Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment
    Perhaps the simplest and the most basic qualitative law of probability is the conjunction rule: The probability of a conjunction, P(A&B), cannot exceed the probabilities of its constituents, P(A) andExpand
    Support theory: A nonextensional representation of subjective probability.
    This article presents a new theory of subjective probability according to which different descriptions of the same event can give rise to different judgments. The experimental evidence confirms theExpand
    Variants of uncertainty in decision-making and their neural correlates
    TLDR
    It was found that different variants of uncertainty entailing different coping strategies can be dissociated due to additionally activated networks, and the phenomenological distinction between processes related to externally and internally attributed uncertainty is paralleled on the cerebral level. Expand
    The "conjunction fallacy" revisited : How intelligent inferences look like reasoning errors
    TLDR
    It is concluded that a failure to recognize the human capacity for semantic and pragmatic inference can lead rational responses to be misclassified as fallacies. Expand
    When Do Base Rates Affect Predictions
    Recent studies have shown that when people make predictions, they often neglect base-rate considerations. Instead of considering what typically happens in situations like the one being judged, theyExpand
    ...
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    ...