THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ‘SUPRA-CONSTITUTIONAL’ LIMITS ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS

@article{Roznai2013THETA,
  title={THE THEORY AND PRACTICE OF ‘SUPRA-CONSTITUTIONAL’ LIMITS ON CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS},
  author={Yaniv Roznai},
  journal={International and Comparative Law Quarterly},
  year={2013},
  volume={62},
  pages={557 - 597}
}
  • Yaniv Roznai
  • Published 1 July 2013
  • Law
  • International and Comparative Law Quarterly
Abstract This article examines whether there are any limitations on constitutional amendment powers that are external to the constitutional system and above it—‘supra-constitutional’ limits. It considers the theory and practice of the relationship between natural law, international law or other supranational law, and domestic constitutional law in a comparative prism. After considering the alleged supremacy of supranational law over constitutional amendments, the author explores the problem of… 

Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments - The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea

Can a constitutional amendment be unconstitutional? Prima facie, this seems like a paradox. This vexing issue has attracted increased attention in recent years. Whereas the definition of the nature

Constitutional amendments and constitutional core values: the Brazilian case in a comparative perspective

  • V. Scotti
  • Law
    Revista de Investigações Constitucionais
  • 2018
The debate over the exercise of primary and secondary constituent power is a long-lasting one and is grounded on positions diverging according to the interpretation of constitutionalism and

'We, the People' Entitlement Within Constitutional Change

In recent years, scholars have produced literature in constitutional amendments, in particular in analyzing the unamendability phenomenon and its relationship with democracy, abusive and populist

From an unconstitutional constitutional amendment to an unconstitutional constitution? Lessons from Honduras

Abstract: The unconstitutional constitutional amendment doctrine has emerged as a highly successful, albeit still controversial, export in comparative constitutional law. The doctrine has often been

Amending constitutional amendment rules

No part of a constitution is more important than the rules that govern its amendment and its entrenchment against it. Given the important functions served by formal constitutional amendment rules, we

A new typology of judicial review of legislation

Abstract The distinction between strong and weak judicial review occupies a privileged place in comparative constitutional law. This article argues that it is necessary to generate a new typology

Constitutionalizing Secession in Order to Harmonize Constitutionality and Democracy in Territorial Decentralized States Like Spain

This text aims to analyze whether constitutionalizing a secession procedure is an adequate way to harmonize the roles of constitutional legality and democracy in regard to the secular territorial

The Hegemonic Preservation Thesis Revisited: The Example of Turkey

This paper offers a critical rereading of the history of judicial review of constitutional amendments in Turkey. We argue that, contrary to appearances, the claim to a power of amendment review on

Conventionality Control and Amendment 95/2016 - A Brazilian Case of Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendment

This article presents reflections on Brazilian Constitutional Amendment 95/2016, which established the New Tax Regime and consequently the ceiling of public spending in Brazil for a period of twenty

The Newest-Oldest Separation of Powers

  • Yaniv Roznai
  • Political Science
    European Constitutional Law Review
  • 2018
Separation of powers is a basic idea within constitutional theory. The principle of separation of powers, as described by Montesquieu in his The Spirit of the Laws, famously centred around three

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 220 REFERENCES

Supremacy Lost: International Law Meets Domestic Constitutional Law

The paper is structured as follows: Part A shows that state constitutons increasingly refer to international law and offers some explanations for this trend. Part B demonstrates how international and

How Supreme is the Supreme Law of the Land? A Comparative Analysis of the Influence of International Human Rights Conventions Upon the Interpretation of Constitutional Texts by Domestic Courts

International human rights law bears substantial resemblance to constitutional law as both bodies of law share similar social functions and goals. Still, courts in a number of influential legal

External Review of Constitutional Amendments? International Law as a Norm of Reference

This article is built around three general observations. The first is that, in the current stage of the development of constitutional theory and practice, there is a need to create procedures

Comparative, global and transnational constitutionalism: The emergence of a transnational legal-pluralist order

Abstract Comparative lawyers have for more than a century sought to increase the understanding of ‘foreign’ legal orders and regulatory systems. Despite some never fully resolved methodological

Unconstitutional Constitutional Amendments - The Migration and Success of a Constitutional Idea

Can a constitutional amendment be unconstitutional? Prima facie, this seems like a paradox. This vexing issue has attracted increased attention in recent years. Whereas the definition of the nature

An unconstitutional constitutional amendment—The Turkish perspective: A comment on the Turkish Constitutional Court’s headscarf decision

In June 2008, the Turkish Constitutional Court annulled amendments to the Constitution regarding the principle of equality and the right to education, which had been enacted by parliament in order to

The Politics of Constitutional Review in France and Europe

To the question “ Is constitutional review by a Constitutional Court law or politics? ” this article responds with a survey of various notions of the “ political, ” providing illustrations drawn from

International Law in its Relation to Constitutional Law

The traditional treatment of international law has almost if not wholly dissociated it from constitutional law. International law has been con­ ceived as concerned only with the abstractions known as

Democracy and Constitutionalism in India: A Study of the Basic Structure Doctrine

This book presents a completely reconfigured understanding of the judicial role in Indian constitutional law. The author presents a completely reconfigured understanding of the judicial role in

International Law as a Resource in Constitutional Interpretation

I. Despite recent polemics, the use of international law in constitutional interpretation, as one factor among others, is highly traditional and eminently proper. Some international law is too
...