THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965

@article{Moxham2017THERS,
  title={THE ROYAL SOCIETY AND THE PREHISTORY OF PEER REVIEW, 1665–1965},
  author={N. Moxham and Aileen Fyfe},
  journal={The Historical Journal},
  year={2017},
  volume={61},
  pages={863 - 889}
}
Abstract Despite being coined only in the early 1970s, ‘peer review’ has become a powerful rhetorical concept in modern academic discourse, tasked with ensuring the reliability and reputation of scholarly research. Its origins have commonly been dated to the foundation of the Philosophical Transactions in 1665, or to early learned societies more generally, with little consideration of the intervening historical development. It is clear from our analysis of the Royal Society's editorial… Expand
Scholarly Review, Old and New
The state of the art in peer review
The limitations to our understanding of peer review
The changing forms and expectations of peer review
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 46 REFERENCES
Making public ahead of print: Meetings and publications at the Royal Society, 1752–1892
  • Aileen Fyfe, N. Moxham
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
  • 2016
Fit for print: developing an institutional model of scientific periodical publishing in England, 1665–ca. 1714
  • N. Moxham
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
  • 2015
Miscellaneous methods: authors, societies and journals in early modern England
  • A. Johns
  • Sociology
  • The British Journal for the History of Science
  • 2000
Journals, learned societies and money: Philosophical Transactions, ca. 1750–1900
  • Aileen Fyfe
  • Political Science, Medicine
  • Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
  • 2015
Credibility, peer review, and Nature, 1945–1990
  • M. Baldwin
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Notes and Records: the Royal Society Journal of the History of Science
  • 2015
The evolution of editorial peer review.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...