# THE LOGIC OF THE CATUSKOTI

@inproceedings{Priest2010THELO, title={THE LOGIC OF THE CATUSKOTI}, author={G. Priest}, year={2010} }

In early Buddhist logic, it was standard to assume that for any state of affairs there were four possibilities: that it held, that it did not, both, or neither. This is the catuskoti (or tetralemma). Classical logicians have had a hard time making sense of this, but it makes perfectly good sense in the semantics of various paraconsistent logics, such as First Degree Entailment. Matters are more complicated for later Buddhist thinkers, such as Nagarjuna, who appear to suggest that none of these… CONTINUE READING

#### Topics from this paper.

40 Citations

#### References

##### Publications referenced by this paper.

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES

Is Buddhist Logic Non-classical or Deviant?”, ch. 9 of Scripture, Logic, Language: Essays on Dharmak ı̄rti and his Tibetan Successors (Boston, MA: Wisdom Publications)

- 1999

Paraconsistent Logic”, pp

- 2002

Buddhist Logic, Vol. 1 (Delhi: Matilal Banarsidass)

- 1993