Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.

@article{Leeflang2008SystematicRO,
  title={Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.},
  author={Mariska M G Leeflang and Jonathan Deeks and Constantine Gatsonis and Patrick M. M. Bossuyt},
  journal={Annals of internal medicine},
  year={2008},
  volume={149 12},
  pages={
          889-97
        }
}
Diagnosis is a critical component of health care, and clinicians, policymakers, and patients routinely face a range of questions regarding diagnostic tests. They want to know whether testing improves outcome; what test to use, purchase, or recommend in practice guidelines; and how to interpret test results. Well-designed diagnostic test accuracy studies can help in making these decisions, provided that they transparently and fully report their participants, tests, methods, and results as… CONTINUE READING
BETA

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 353 CITATIONS

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2008
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 13 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 35 Citations per year over the last 3 years

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 65 REFERENCES

editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0

  • JJ Deeks, PM Bossuyt, C Gatsonis
  • 2009
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

Urinary level of nuclear matrix protein 22 in the diagnosis of bladder cancer: Academia and Clinic Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy

  • R Casella, P Huber, A Blöchlinger, F Stoffel, P Dalquen, TC Gasser
  • Annals of Internal Medicine Volume
  • 2008

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…