Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)

@inproceedings{Galipeau2013SystematicRO,
  title={Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol)},
  author={James Galipeau and David Moher and Becky Skidmore and Craig Campbell and Paul J Hendry and D William Cameron and Paul C. H{\'e}bert and Anita Palepu},
  booktitle={Systematic reviews},
  year={2013}
}
BACKGROUND An estimated $100 billion is lost to 'waste' in biomedical research globally, annually, much of which comes from the poor quality of published research. One area of waste involves bias in reporting research, which compromises the usability of published reports. In response, there has been an upsurge in interest and research in the scientific process of writing, editing, peer reviewing, and publishing (that is, journalology) of biomedical research. One reason for bias in reporting and… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 23 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
6 Citations
40 References
Similar Papers

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 40 references

Analysing data and undertaking metaanalyses. In Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0

  • JJ Deeks, JPT Higgins, DG Altman
  • Edited by Higgins JPT,
  • 2011
Highly Influential
6 Excerpts

Analysing data and undertaking meta - analyses

  • JJ Deeks, Higgins JPT, DG Altman
  • Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of…
  • 2011

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…