Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties.

@article{Pieper2015SystematicRF,
  title={Systematic review found AMSTAR, but not R(evised)-AMSTAR, to have good measurement properties.},
  author={Dawid Pieper and Roland B{\"u}chter and Lun Li and Barbara Prediger and Michaela Eikermann},
  journal={Journal of clinical epidemiology},
  year={2015},
  volume={68 5},
  pages={574-83}
}
OBJECTIVES To summarize all available evidence on measurement properties in terms of reliability, validity, and feasibility of the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) tool, including R(evised)-AMSTAR. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING MEDLINE, EMBASE, Psycinfo, and CINAHL were searched for studies containing information on measurement properties of the tools in October 2013. We extracted data on study characteristics and measurement properties. These data were analyzed following… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 17 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 31 extracted citations

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…