Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals

@inproceedings{Howard2017SystematicRO,
  title={Systematic review: Outcome reporting bias is a problem in high impact factor neurology journals},
  author={Benjamin Howard and Jared Thomas Scott and Mark Blubaugh and Brie Roepke and Caleb Josiah Scheckel and Matt Vassar},
  booktitle={PloS one},
  year={2017}
}
BACKGROUND Selective outcome reporting is a significant methodological concern. Comparisons between the outcomes reported in clinical trial registrations and those later published allow investigators to understand the extent of selection bias among trialists. We examined the possibility of selective outcome reporting in randomized controlled trials (RCTs… CONTINUE READING