Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised, Other-than-Placebo Controlled, Trials of Non-Individualised Homeopathic Treatment

@article{Mathie2018SystematicRA,
  title={Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised, Other-than-Placebo Controlled, Trials of Non-Individualised Homeopathic Treatment},
  author={Robert T. Mathie and Yvonne Fok and Petter Viksveen and Aaron To and Jonathan R. T. Davidson},
  journal={Homeopathy},
  year={2018},
  volume={108},
  pages={088 - 101},
  url={https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:73411409}
}
The current data preclude a decisive conclusion about the comparative effectiveness ofNIHT, and the highest intrinsic quality was observed in the equivalence and non-inferiority trials of NIHT.

Assessing the magnitude of reporting bias in trials of homeopathy: a cross-sectional study and meta-analysis

The magnitude of reporting bias in trials assessing homeopathic treatments and its impact on evidence syntheses is assessed to assess the validity of the body of evidence of homeopathy literature and may overestimate the true treatment effect of homeopathic remedies.

Placebos and the Placebo Effect in Drug Trials.

It should be the goal of all therapeutic trials to minimize the placebo effect in clinical trials, while utilizing and maximizing it in clinical routine.

Diversity and Excellence in Homeopathy Research

This issue of Homeopathy is delighted to welcome these specialist experts: Paulo Bellavite, Steven Cartwright, Carolina de Oliveira, José Eizayaga, Michael Frass, Anisur Khuda-Bukhsh, Christien Klein-Laansma, Emma MacíasCortés, Lionel Milgrom, Tony Pinkus, Elio Rossi, Marcus Teixeira, Michael Teut and Silvia Waisse.

Homeopathic Treatments of Upper Respiratory and Otorhinolaryngologic Infections: A Review of Randomized and Observational Studies

    P. Bellavite
    Medicine
  • 2019
Homeopathic formulations in upper respiratory tract and otorhinolaryngological infections are likely effective and the individualized approach in non severe otitis is possibly effective.

Evidence-Based Human Homeopathy and Veterinary Homeopathy. Comment on Bergh et al. A Systematic Review of Complementary and Alternative Veterinary Medicine: “Miscellaneous Therapies”. Animals 2021, 11, 3356

Criteria for evidence-based medicine for design, conduction, documentation, and rating of studies in homeopathy are considered, effects on all quality levels according to Cochrane criteria are recognizable, especially for individualized homeopathy, even in methodologically high-quality studies.

The Need for Multidisciplinary Research within the History and Theory of Homeopathy

To reveal and demonstrate developments and relationships on a scientific level, there is a need for multidisciplinary research on the part of the humanities, such as history and theory of medicine, history and history of science, history of economics, sociology of scientific knowledge, and philosophy.

Prescriptions of homeopathic remedies at the expense of the German statutory health insurance from 1985 to 2021: scientific, legal and pharmacoeconomic analysis.

The costs and their development over time incurred by homeopathic remedies in the healthcare system from 1985 to 2021 are shown and abolition of reimbursement of homeopathic medicines in Germany at the expense of the SHI system is well justified.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised, Other-than-Placebo Controlled, Trials of Individualised Homeopathic Treatment

The current data preclude a decisive conclusion about the comparative effectiveness of IHT, but future OTP-controlled trials in homeopathy should aim, as far as possible, to promote both internal validity and external validity.

Randomised placebo-controlled trials of individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

Medicines prescribed in individualised homeopathy may have small, specific treatment effects and the low or unclear overall quality of the evidence prompts caution in interpreting the findings.

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials of non-individualised homeopathic treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis

A meta-analysis of all extractable data leads to rejection of the null hypothesis that the main outcome of treatment using a non-individualised (standardised) homeopathic medicine is indistinguishable from that of placebo, but analysis of a small sub-group of reliable evidence does not support that rejection.

Are the clinical effects of homeopathy placebo effects? A meta-analysis of placebo-controlled trials.

It is found insufficient evidence from these studies that homeopathy is clearly efficacious for any single clinical condition, and the hypothesis that the clinical effects of homeopathy are completely due to placebo is not compatible.

Evidence of clinical efficacy of homeopathy

There is some evidence that homeopathic treatments are more effective than placebo; however, the strength of this evidence is low because of the low methodological quality of the trials.

Method for appraising model validity of randomised controlled trials of homeopathic treatment: multi-rater concordance study

MVHT is defined as the extent to which a homeopathic intervention and the main measure of its outcome, as implemented in a randomised controlled trial (RCT), reflect 'state-of-the-art' homeopathic practice.