System upgrade and its complications in patients with a single lead atrial pacemaker: data from the DANPACE trial.

@article{Kirkfeldt2013SystemUA,
  title={System upgrade and its complications in patients with a single lead atrial pacemaker: data from the DANPACE trial.},
  author={Rikke Esberg Kirkfeldt and Henning Rud Andersen and Jens Cosedis Nielsen},
  journal={Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology},
  year={2013},
  volume={15 8},
  pages={
          1166-73
        }
}
  • R. Kirkfeldt, H. Andersen, J. Nielsen
  • Published 1 August 2013
  • Medicine
  • Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
AIMS To investigate the indications for system upgrade with single lead atrial pacing (AAIR), complications associated with these re-interventions, and possible predictors for system upgrade among patients included in the Danish Multicenter Randomized Trial on AAIR vs. dual-chamber pacing (DDDR) in sick sinus syndrome (DANPACE). METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 707 of 1415 patients were randomized to AAIR pacing. Mean follow-up was 5.5 ± 2.6 years. Information on indications for system upgrade… 
View on PubMed
academic.oup.com
4 Citations

4 Citations

Citation Type

Citation Type

Detect Long‐term Complications After ICD Replacement (DECODE): Rationale and Study Design of a Multicenter Italian Registry
TLDR
Assessment of complication rates after ICD replacement in a real‐life setting will help estimate the actual long‐term cost of ICD therapy and assess the real impact of increasing ICD longevity on cost‐effectiveness.
Cardiac Device Infections: A Lesson from the Registries
The number of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) implantations keeps on rising over the years as a result of population growth, increasing life expectancy, and better access to healthcare.…
Sinus Node Dysfunction
13 – Pacing for Sinus Node Disease

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES
Long-term clinical performance of AAI pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: a comparison with dual-chamber pacing.
  • H. Masumoto, Y. Ueda, +4 authors M. Usui
  • Medicine
    Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology
  • 2004
A comparison of single-lead atrial pacing with dual-chamber pacing in sick sinus syndrome.
TLDR
In patients with sick sinus syndrome, there is no statistically significant difference in death from any cause between AAIR pacing andDDDR pacing, and these findings support the routine use of DDDR pacing in these patients.
[Clinical safety and efficacy of single-chamber atrial pacing in sick sinus syndrome: long-term follow-up].
TLDR
The AAI/AAIR pacing mode was safe and effective in sinus node dysfunction, with a low percentage of pacing changes required for progression to atrioventricular block, low incidence of atrial arrhythmias, stroke and low mortality during long term follow-up.
A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome.
Complication Rates Associated With Pacemaker or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Generator Replacements and Upgrade Procedures: Results From the REPLACE Registry
TLDR
Pacemaker and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements are associated with a notable complication risk, particularly those with lead additions, which support careful decision making before device replacement, when managing device advisories, and when considering upgrades to more complex systems.
Natural history of sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing in 213 patients: implications for selection of stimulation mode.
Atrial Pacing and the Risk for AV Block: Is There a Time for Change in Attitude?
TLDR
There was no significant difference in follow‐up time between studies that showed a low, compared with a high incidence of AV‐block, and patients with sinus node disease treated with atrial pacing have a low risk of developing clinically important conduction disturbancies.
Atrioventricular conduction during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome.
TLDR
AV conduction, estimated as PQ interval and atrial stimulus-Q interval at atrial pacing rates of 100 and 120 bpm and the Wenckebach block point, remains stable during long-term follow-up and can be recommended to patients with sick sinus syndrome without bundle-branch block.
Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome
Long-term pacing in sinus node disease: effects of stimulation mode on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.
...
1
2
3
...