Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews

@article{Par2015SynthesizingIS,
  title={Synthesizing information systems knowledge: A typology of literature reviews},
  author={Guy Par{\'e} and Marie-Claude Trudel and Mirou Jaana and Spyros Kitsiou},
  journal={Inf. Manag.},
  year={2015},
  volume={52},
  pages={183-199}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Transparency in literature reviews: an assessment of reporting practices across review types and genres in top IS journals
TLDR
The findings indicate inadequate reporting of the methods, procedures, and techniques used in a majority of reviews, and recommend that authors of all forms of reviews better document design decisions so to increase trustworthiness, get meaningful results, and develop a cumulative body of knowledge in this discipline.
A Synthesis of Literature Review Guidelines from Information Systems Journals
TLDR
There are different types of literature review, but that the five broad stages are generally valid for all types, and the greatest variation between types occurs at Stage 4, when analysing, synthesising and interpreting data.
CONDUCTING SYSTEMATIC LITERATURE REVIEWS IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS: AN ANALYSIS OF GUIDELINES
This paper analyzes the guidelines for systematic literature reviews in the Information Systems (IS) field based on 12 influential journal articles published from 2002 through 2018. The analysis
A citation analysis of theoretical concept reviews
TLDR
It is recommended that literature review authors should routinely present the elements of theory in their reviews since this is demonstrably valuable to readers.
(Re)considering the Concept of Reproducibility of Information Systems Literature Reviews
TLDR
It is found that the concept of reproducibility has been misunderstood in much of the guidance to authors of IS literature reviews, and several suggestions are made for clarifying the terminology and identifying when reproducecibility is desirable and feasible withinIS literature reviews.
An Overview of Reviews as a Trend Maker in the Field
The authors consider the methodology basics of reviews as a prospective type of scholarly publications, their taxonomy and most popular review types (narrative reviews, bibliometric reviews,
Contextualizing the twin concepts of systematicity and transparency in information systems literature reviews
TLDR
It is argued that a systematic approach, accompanied by transparent reporting, is essential for positivist as well as interpretivist reviews, regardless of their specific type, scope and methods.
Theory of Knowledge for Literature Reviews: An Epistemological Model, Taxonomy and Empirical Analysis of IS Literature
TLDR
An epistemological taxonomy of IS literature reviews is derived, which complements previously suggested typologies and builds a bridge between the previously largely unconnected fields of literature reviews and epistemology.
Critical literature reviews: A critique and actionable advice
This article treats critical literature reviews as a distinct review type, and presents a critique of author-labeled critical literature reviews in Organization and Management Studies. We identify
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 283 REFERENCES
Organizing knowledge syntheses: A taxonomy of literature reviews
A taxonomy of literature reviews in education and psychology is presented. The taxonomy categorizes reviews according to: (a) focus; (b) goal; (c) perspective; (d) coverage; (e) organization; and (f)
A Guide to Conducting a Systematic Literature Review of Information Systems Research
TLDR
This article presents a methodology for conducting a systematic literature review with many examples from IS research and references to guides with further helpful details, and provides detailed guidelines to writing a high-quality theory-mining review.
Using scoping literature reviews as a means of understanding and interpreting existing literature.
TLDR
Scoping reviews are presented as an efficient way of identifying themes and trends in high-volume areas of scientific inquiry as well as other established methods for understanding and interpreting extant research literature.
Writing narrative literature reviews for peer-reviewed journals: secrets of the trade.
Methods for Integrative Reviews
This study examined methods for reviews of research that focus on inferring generalizations about substantive issues from a set of studies directly bearing on those issues. The purposes were to: (1)
The Relevance of Systematic Reviews to Educational Policy and Practice
This paper argues that educational policy and practice has much to gain from systematic reviews and other methods of research synthesis. Different types of reviews are considered, including narrative
Writing Narrative Literature Reviews
TLDR
Narrative literature reviews can tackle broader and more abstract questions, can engage in more post hoc theorizing without the danger of capitalizing on chance, can make a stronger case for a null-hypothesis conclusion, and can appreciate and use methodological diversity better.
A systematic, tool-supported method for conducting literature reviews in information systems
TLDR
This paper presents how to best identify relevant IS papers to review within a feasible and justifiable scope, how to extract relevant content from identified papers,How to synthesise and analyse the findings of a literature review and what are ways to effectively write and present the results of a Literature review.
Empirical Research in Information Systems: The Practice of Relevance
This commentary discusses why most IS acade- mic research today lacks relevance to practice and suggests tactics, procedures, and guidelines that the IS academic community might follow in their
The art and science of knowledge synthesis.
...
...