Synaesthesia: the prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences.


Sensory and cognitive mechanisms allow stimuli to be perceived with properties relating to sight, sound, touch, etc, and ensure, for example, that visual properties are perceived as visual experiences, rather than sounds, tastes, smells, etc. Theories of normal development can be informed by cases where this modularity breaks down, in a condition known as synaesthesia. Conventional wisdom has held that this occurs extremely rarely (0.05% of births) and affects women more than men. Here we present the first test of synaesthesia prevalence with sampling that does not rely on self-referral, and which uses objective tests to establish genuineness. We show that (a) the prevalence of synaesthesia is 88 times higher than previously assumed, (b) the most common variant is coloured days, (c) the most studied variant (grapheme-colour synaesthesia)--previously believed most common--is prevalent at 1%, and (d) there is no strong asymmetry in the distribution of synaesthesia across the sexes. Hence, we suggest that female biases reported earlier likely arose from (or were exaggerated by) sex differences in self-disclosure.

3 Figures and Tables

Citations per Year

446 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 446 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Simner2006SynaesthesiaTP, title={Synaesthesia: the prevalence of atypical cross-modal experiences.}, author={Julia Simner and Catherine M. Mulvenna and Noam Sagiv and Elias Tsakanikos and Sarah A Witherby and Christine H Fraser and Kirsten M. Scott and Jamie Ward}, journal={Perception}, year={2006}, volume={35 8}, pages={1024-33} }