Symmetry as a Criterion for Comprehension Motivating Quine’s ‘New Foundations’

@article{Holmes2008SymmetryAA,
  title={Symmetry as a Criterion for Comprehension Motivating Quine’s ‘New Foundations’},
  author={M. Randall Holmes},
  journal={Studia Logica},
  year={2008},
  volume={88},
  pages={195-213}
}
  • M. R. Holmes
  • Published 28 February 2008
  • Philosophy
  • Studia Logica
A common objection to Quine’s set theory “New Foundations” is that it is inadequately motivated because the restriction on comprehension which appears to avert paradox is a syntactical trick. We present a semantic criterion for determining whether a class is a set (a kind of symmetry) which motivates NF. 

Invariance under permutations as a semantic motivation for Stratification

This article examines the notion of invariance under different kinds of permutations in a milieu of a theory of classes and sets, as a semantic motivation for Quine's new foundations "NF". The

Normal subgroups of infinite symmetric groups, with an application to stratified set theory

If X is an infinite set with ∣X∣ = ∢X × X∣ then Symm(X) has no nontrivial normal subgroups of small index, and it is shown that every normal subgroup of Symm (X) (of small index) must contain every flexible permutation.

Multicoloured Random Graphs: Constructions and Symmetry

This is a research monograph on constructions of and group actions on countable homogeneous graphs, concentrating particularly on the simple random graph and its edge-coloured variants. We study

Symmetry motivates a new consistent fragment of NF and an extension of NF with semantic motivation

A sequence of theories of sets and classes is presented, indexed by a natural number parameter k. The criterion for determining which classes are sets has to do with symmetry. The theories with k 2

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES

The Axiom of Choice in Quine's New Foundations for Mathematical Logic.

  • E. Specker
  • Philosophy, Economics
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
  • 1953
The object of this note is to disprove the axiom of choice in Quine’s “New Foundations” by obtaining theAxiom of infinity as a corollary.

On the Consistency of a Slight (?) Modification of Quine’s New Foundations

Quine’s system of set theory, New Foundations (NF), can be conveniently formalized as a first-order theory containing two predicates ≡ (identity) and e (set membership). One of the most attractive

The set-theoretical program of Quine succeeded, but nobody noticed

It is argued that, in spite of the fact that the consistency of NF remains an open question, the relative consistency results for NFU obtained by R. B. Jensen in 1969 demonstrate that Quine* s general approach can be used successfully.

Quine's Individuals

A set of axioms for logic

One of the preeminent problems confronting logicians is that of constructing a system of logic which will be adequate for mathematics, and the system of Quine's that this work is concerned is concerned.

New Foundations for Mathematical Logic

(1937). New Foundations for Mathematical Logic. The American Mathematical Monthly: Vol. 44, No. 2, pp. 70-80.

On the consistency of an impredicative subsystem of Quine's NF

  • M. Crabbé
  • Computer Science, Philosophy
    Journal of Symbolic Logic
  • 1982
It is shown that NFP is really weaker than NFI; similarly, NFI is weaker than NF; this result will be obtained in the following manner.

A System of Axiomatic Set Theory-Part VI

This chapter defines a function to be a class of pairs in which different elements always have different first members such that, to every element a of its domain there is a unique element b of its converse domain determined by the condition 〈 a, b 〉 ηF .

Set Theory with a Universal Set