Symbolic Spaces of Difference: Contesting the Eruv in Barnet, London and Tenafly, New Jersey

  title={Symbolic Spaces of Difference: Contesting the Eruv in Barnet, London and Tenafly, New Jersey},
  author={S. Watson},
  journal={Environment and Planning D: Society and Space},
  pages={597 - 613}
  • S. Watson
  • Published 2005
  • Sociology
  • Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
  • In this paper I explore discourses and resistances mobilized around the construction of an Orthodox Jewish symbolic and material concrete space, the ‘eruv’, in two localities (one in the United Kingdom, one in the USA) where it has been at the center of heated debate and contestation. Conflicts around the reordering and redefining of this public space expose some of the limits of living with difference and normative versions of multiculturalism in the city. Through a detailed examination of two… CONTINUE READING

    Figures from this paper.

    Creating Place, Creating Community: The Intangible Boundaries of the Jewish ‘Eruv’
    • 8
    • Highly Influenced
    Negotiating Jewishness : identity and citizenship in the Leeds Jewish community
    • 1
    • PDF
    An Eruv for St Ives? Religion, identity, place and conflict on the Sydney north shore
    • 1
    • Highly Influenced
    The Everyday Dynamics of Belfast's 'Neutral' City Centre: Maternal Perspectives
    • 9
    • PDF


    Publications referenced by this paper.
    Talmudic Territory? Space, Law and Modernist Discourse
    • 31
    The mosque in the suburbs: Negotiating religion and ethnicity in South London
    • 131
    Institutionalised religion: sacred texts and Jewish spatial practice
    • 54
    • Highly Influential
    Justice and the Politics of Difference
    • 5,891
    • PDF
    A Town Hall
    • 4
    Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers
    • 2,046
    • Highly Influential
    Appellate court allows Tenafly eruv to remain up'' Chicago Jewish Community on Line (Jewish United Fund News and Public Affairs)
      Conclusion: the multicultural question
      • 1998
      Conclusion: the multicultural question
      • 2000