Symbolic Hate: Intention to Intimidate, Political Ideology, and Group Association

@article{Wiener2008SymbolicHI,
  title={Symbolic Hate: Intention to Intimidate, Political Ideology, and Group Association},
  author={Richard L. Wiener and Erin M. Richter},
  journal={Law and Human Behavior},
  year={2008},
  volume={32},
  pages={463-476}
}
In Virginia v. Black (123 S.Ct. 1536, 2003), the Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment did not bar statutes that prohibit cross burnings in which defendants acted with intention to intimidate others. Using a variety of symbols including cross burnings, swastikas, confederate flags, and skin fists, the current research tested how mock jurors used alternative actor intentions to judge culpability in symbolic hate speech cases. Only partially validating the Court’s assumptions, participants… 

The relationship between political ideology and punishment: What do jury panel members say?

This study examines the effect of the self-identified political ideology of jurors and the tendency of those jurors to assess punishment. Significant research has been conducted that suggests an

Equal Protection versus Free Speech Rights: When Gains Loom Larger than Losses

Summary This paper examines the tension between equal protection and free speech in the hate speech context through a prospect theory lens. Two hundred and fifty-four participants recruited through

Blame Attribution in Court: Conceptualization and Measurement of Perpetrator Blame

Abstract Drawing on legal and psychological theory of blame, the present study evaluates psychometric properties of the Perceptions of Blame Scale (PBS; Rayburn, Mendoza, & Davison, 2003) across

Inner Terror and Outward Hate: The Effects of Mortality Salience on Bias Motivated Attacks

In 2008, a year that an African American man was elected President of the United States, and same sex unions were temporarily legalized in California and recognized in New York, reminders of

Harm and responsibility in hate speech

The legal restriction of hate speech – i.e. speech that expresses contempt for people on the basis of their ethnicity, religion, or sexuality – is now commonplace in liberal legal systems outside the

Mass media, new technology, and ideology: An analysis of political trends in China

Based on a nationwide survey, this study examines the mediated constructions of political ideology and its antecedents in contemporary China. The empirical findings offer insights into China’s future

Notes From A Leisure Son: Expanding An Understanding of Whiteness in Leisure

Abstract Whiteness is a fundamental aspect of American society and because of this leisure research is as troubled as our own racialized identities. Whiteness becomes a problematic dimension in our

Emotion and the Law : Psychological Perspectives

Emotion and the Law: A Field Whose Time Has Come.- Affect in Legal and Forensic Settings: The Cognitive Benefits of Not Being Too Happy.- Emotional Influences on Judgments of Legal Blame: How They

Emotion and the Law: A Field Whose Time Has Come

Psychological research on emotion has a rich and varied history. A number of protopsychologists (e.g., Aristotle, Aquinas, Descartes, Hume) wrote about the effect of the passions on human thought and

Finding the assumptions in the law: Social analytic jurisprudence, disability, and aging workers

Analysis of the current state of research in disability and age discrimination in the workplace shows a field that is lacking in theoretical organization. The literature remains scattered and

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 20 REFERENCES

Vicarious Annihilation: The Effect of Mortality Salience on Perceptions of Hate Crimes

TLDR
Perceptions of hate crimes represent a unique class of crime where both the perpetrator and victim may be viewed as worldview violators and mortality salient participants were less punitive toward offenders who attacked these specific worldview-threatening victims.

The Effects of Prior Workplace Behavior on Subsequent Sexual Harassment Judgments

TLDR
A dual processing model of sexual harassment judgments predicted that the behavior of a complainant in a prior case would influence evaluations in an unrelated subsequent case, and an aggressive complainant observed in the first scenario caused participants (especially women) to rate lower the likelihood that a neutral complainant in an independent case was the victim of gender discrimination.

Experiencing Hate Speech: Perceptions and Responses to Anti‐Semitism and Antigay Speech

This study examines how people experience hate speech. Specifically, it assesses people’s perceptions regarding both the antecedents and outcomes of such expression targeted at Jews and homosexuals.

The fit and implementation of sexual harassment law to workplace evaluations.

TLDR
Undergraduate participants taking the perspective of the complainant were more sensitive to offensive conduct than were those adopting an objective perspective, and the utilitarian altemative further increased sensitivity on some measures, but it failed to produce a principled judgment strategy.

Retaliation, Fear, or Rage

An experimental study was conducted in an effort to establish whether hate crimes produce greater harm than similarly egregious crimes. Hate crimes are considered to be worse primarily because they

Psychological Perspectives on Hate Crime Laws.

Hate crimes are those in which the victim is selected because of his or her actual or perceived race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or national origin. Hate crime laws have

„So, what's a hate crime anyway?” young adults' perceptions of hate crimes, victims, and perpetrators

Male and female young adults provided responses to open-ended questions about hate crimes. Results indicated considerable variability in their definitions, with perceptions of hate crimes differing

From Slavery to Hate Crime Laws: The Emergence of Race and Status‐Based Protection in American Criminal Law

Criminal laws that punish discriminatory "hate crime" offenses relating to race, religion, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, and other status characteristics trace their roots back to the

Harmful Speech in Intergroup Encounters: An Organizational Framework for Communication Research

Verbally disturbing communication, or what is broadly referred to as harmful speech (e.g., racist, sexist, and ageist speech), is a growing but fragmented area of inquiry in need of integration. In

Understanding the harm of hate crime

This article provides an overview of the context and content of this issue devoted to hate crime. Working definitions of hate crime and hate speech are situated within the broader context of