Symbiont switching and alternative resource acquisition strategies drive mutualism breakdown

@article{Werner2018SymbiontSA,
  title={Symbiont switching and alternative resource acquisition strategies drive mutualism breakdown},
  author={Gijsbert D. A. Werner and Johannes H. C. Cornelissen and William K. Cornwell and Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia and Jens Kattge and Stuart Andrew West and E. Toby Kiers},
  journal={Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences},
  year={2018},
  volume={115},
  pages={5229 - 5234}
}
Significance Cooperative interactions among species—mutualisms—are major sources of evolutionary innovation. However, despite their importance, two species that formerly cooperated sometimes cease their partnership. Why do mutualisms break down? We asked this question in the partnership between arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi and their plant hosts, one of the most ancient mutualisms. We analyze two potential trajectories toward evolutionary breakdown of their cooperation, symbiont switching… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Obligate mutualistic cooperation limits evolvability
TLDR
This study experimentally demonstrates that members of obligate cooperative mutualisms are less able to adapt evolutionarily to external selection pressures and are more likely to return to metabolic autonomy than their free-living counterparts.
Coevolutionary transitions from antagonism to mutualism explained by the Co-Opted Antagonist Hypothesis
TLDR
The COA theory helps to reconcile several major challenges concerning the mechanisms of mutualism evolution, such as how mutualisms evolve without extremely tight host fidelity (vertical transmission) and how ecological context influences evolutionary outcomes, and vice-versa.
Mutualists construct the ecological conditions that trigger the transition from parasitism
TLDR
It is hypothesized that spatial structure can lead to the formation of higher selection levels favouring mutualism, similar to the evolution of altruism, with the additional requirement that the offspring of mutualistic hosts and symbionts must co-occur often enough.
Constraints upon cheating emergence in mutualistic networks: evidence in the mycorrhizal symbiosis
TLDR
Investigating the structures of interaction networks and the patterns of phylogenetic distributions of cheaters provides an integrative framework to evaluate the strength of constraints upon cheaters in the mycorrhizal mutualistic symbiosis, linking land plants to fungi.
Coevolved mutualists experience fluctuating costs and benefits over time
TLDR
The quick, nonlinear, and asynchronous evolution of yeast mutualists closely resembles antagonistic coevolutionary patterns, supporting the view that mutualisms should be considered as reciprocal exploitation.
Cheating emergences in the arbuscular mycorrhizal mutualism: a network and phylogenetic analysis
TLDR
It is shown that MH cheating repeatedly evolved in the vascular flora, suggesting low phylogenetic constraint for plants, and an empirical multiple-partners mutualistic system illustrating that the overall persistence of mutualism can be linked to functional constraints upon cheating emergences.
The macroevolutionary dynamics of symbiotic and phenotypic diversification in lichens
TLDR
While symbiont identity and symbiotic phenotype influence the ecology and physiology of lichens, they are not correlated with rates of lineage birth and death, suggesting more complex dynamics underly lichen diversification.
Cheating in arbuscular mycorrhizal mutualism: a network and phylogenetic analysis of mycoheterotrophy.
TLDR
This framework investigates the patterns of specialization and phylogenetic distribution of mycoheterotrophic cheaters versus non-cheating autotrophic plants and their respective fungi in a global arbuscular mycorrhizal network with >25,000 interactions to assess the presence of constraints upon cheating emergences in mutualisms.
An ancestral signalling pathway is conserved in plant lineages forming intracellular symbioses
TLDR
Through analysis of 271 transcriptomes and 122 plant genomes, it is demonstrated that the common symbiosis signalling pathway controlling the association with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and with nitrogen-fixing bacteria specifically co-evolved with intracellular endosymbioses, including ericoid and orchid myCorrhizae in angiosperms and ericoids-like associations of bryophytes.
Microbial evolution and transitions along the parasite–mutualist continuum
TLDR
The mechanisms underpinning these evolutionary shifts, as well as the ecological drivers and why some host–microorganism interactions may be stuck at the end of the continuum are discussed.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 100 REFERENCES
Host sanctions and the legume–rhizobium mutualism
TLDR
It is shown that soybeans penalize rhizobia that fail to fix N2 inside their root nodules, and non-invasive monitoring implicated decreased O2 supply as a possible mechanism for sanctions against cheating Rhizobia.
Non-mutualistic yucca moths and their evolutionary consequences
TLDR
Phylogenetic evidence is presented for reversal of an obligate mutualism within the yucca moth complex, supporting predictions that evolution of cheating within a single pollinator is evolutionary unstable and several lines of evidence support a hypothesis that host shifts preceded the reversal of obligate Mutualism.
Reciprocal Rewards Stabilize Cooperation in the Mycorrhizal Symbiosis
TLDR
It is concluded that, unlike many other mutualisms, the symbiont cannot be “enslaved,” and the mutualism is evolutionarily stable because control is bidirectional, and partners offering the best rate of exchange are rewarded.
Evolutionary signals of symbiotic persistence in the legume–rhizobia mutualism
TLDR
It is found that more than half of the 1,195 extant nodulating legumes analyzed have a high likelihood of being in a state of high symbiotic persistence, meaning that they show a continued capacity to form the symbiosis over evolutionary time, even though the partnership has remained facultative and is not obligate.
The evolution of host-symbiont dependence
TLDR
Both transmission mode and symbiont function are correlated with host dependence, with reductions in host fitness being greatest when nutrient-provisioning, vertically transmitted symbionts are removed and results suggest that both function and population structure are important in driving irreversible dependence between hosts and symbions.
Partner abundance controls mutualism stability and the pace of morphological change over geologic time
TLDR
The study reveals that mutualistic strategy profoundly affects the pace of morphological change in traits involved in the interaction and suggests that shifts in partners’ relative abundances may frequently drive reversions of generalist mutualisms to autonomy.
The evolution of mutualism.
  • E. Leigh
  • Environmental Science
    Journal of evolutionary biology
  • 2010
TLDR
Both symbioses and brief-exchange mutualisms have transformed whole ecosystems and may be steps towards ecosystems which, like Adam Smith's ideal economy, serve their members' common good.
Pathways to mutualism breakdown.
Mutualisms in a changing world: an evolutionary perspective.
TLDR
An evolutionary perspective on mutualism breakdown is developed to complement the ecological perspective, by focusing on three processes: shifts from mutualism to antagonism, switches to novel partners and mutualism abandonment.
Heritable symbiosis: The advantages and perils of an evolutionary rabbit hole
TLDR
Genes underlying the host–symbiont interface are predicted to follow a coevolutionary arms race, as observed for genes governing host–pathogen interactions, which is predicted to accelerate host speciation rates by generating genetic incompatibilities.
...
...