Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

@article{Rhodes2017SurvivingSC,
  title={Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016},
  author={Andrew Rhodes and Laura Evans and Waleed Alhazzani and Mitchell M. Levy and Massimo Antonelli and Ricard Ferrer and Anand . Kumar and Jonathan E. Sevransky and Charles L Sprung and Mark E. Nunnally and Bram Rochwerg and Gordon David Rubenfeld and Derek C. Angus and Djillali Annane and Richard Beale and Geoff Bellinghan and Gordon R. Bernard and Jean Daniel Chiche and Craig M. Coopersmith and Daniel de Backer and Craig J French and Seitaro Fujishima and Herwig Gerlach and Jorge Luis Hidalgo and Steven M. Hollenberg and Alan E. Jones and Dilip R Karnad and Ruth Kleinpell and Younsuk Koh and Thiago Lisboa and Fl{\'a}via Ribeiro Machado and John J. Marini and John C. Marshall and John E. Mazuski and Lauralyn McIntyre and Anthony S McLean and Sangeeta Mehta and Rui Moreno and John Myburgh and Paolo Navalesi and Osamu Nishida and Tiffany Medlin Osborn and Anders Perner and Colleen M. Plunkett and Marco Vito Ranieri and Christa A. Schorr and Maureen A. Seckel and Christopher W. Seymour and Lisa Shieh and Khalid A. Shukri and Steven Q. Simpson and Mervyn Singer and Boyd Taylor Thompson and Sean Robert Townsend and Tom van der Poll and Jean Louis Vincent and Willem Joost Wiersinga and Janice L. Zimmerman and Richard Phillip Dellinger},
  journal={Intensive Care Medicine},
  year={2017},
  volume={43},
  pages={304-377}
}
ObjectiveTo provide an update to “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012”.DesignA consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all… Expand
Surviving Sepsis Campaign International Guidelines for the Management of Septic Shock and Sepsis-Associated Organ Dysfunction in Children
  • S. Weiss, M. Peters, +48 authors P. Tissières
  • Medicine
  • Pediatric critical care medicine : a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies
  • 2020
TLDR
A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Expand
Surviving sepsis campaign international guidelines for the management of septic shock and sepsis-associated organ dysfunction in children
TLDR
A large cohort of international experts was able to achieve consensus regarding many recommendations for the best care of children with sepsis, acknowledging that most aspects of care had relatively low quality of evidence resulting in the frequent issuance of weak recommendations. Expand
Surviving sepsis campaign: research priorities for sepsis and septic shock
TLDR
While the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines give multiple recommendations on the treatment of sepsis, significant knowledge gaps remain, both in bedside issues directly applicable to clinicians, as well as understanding the fundamental mechanisms underlying the development and progression ofSepsis. Expand
Diagnosis and Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: An Evidence-Based Review
  • G. Tulli
  • Medicine
  • Practical Trends in Anesthesia and Intensive Care 2018
  • 2019
TLDR
The Sequential (Sepsis-related) Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) criteria and “quick” (q)SOFA criteria should be used to identify sepsis, in place of the currently used systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria, which were the basis for the previous definition of sepsi. Expand
Sepsis in 2018: a review
TLDR
The crux of sepsis management remains early identification and diagnostic testing, early antimicrobial therapy, and early haemodynamic resuscitation. Expand
International critical care nursing considerations and quality indicators for the 2017 surviving sepsis campaign guidelines
TLDR
Four leading international critical care organizations collaborated to outline considerations for nursing care based on the revised SSC guidelines, and nurse-sensitive actions and quality indicators were identified based on key areas of nursing care as outlined in the guidelines. Expand
Implementation of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines
TLDR
This review describes methods that have been shown to improve bedside application of the evidence-based guidelines of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign and revolves around practice improvement measures. Expand
[SSC International Guideline 2016 - Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock].
  • T. Rahmel
  • Medicine
  • Anasthesiologie, Intensivmedizin, Notfallmedizin, Schmerztherapie : AINS
  • 2018
TLDR
The article summarizes the most important recommendations and additionally discusses some crucial amendments to encourage the reader to incorporate the new guideline into clinical practice, thus improving the prognosis of patients suffering from sepsis or septic shock. Expand
Sepsis in the critically ill patient: current and emerging management strategies
TLDR
The main emerging strategies focus on immunomodulation, artificial intelligence, and on multi-omics approaches for a personalized therapy that relies on source control, early antibiotics, and organ support. Expand
Sepsis 2018: Definitions and Guideline Changes.
TLDR
This review discusses the new Sepsis-3 definitions and guidelines and proposes a new screening tool for sepsis (quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [qSOFA]) to predict the likelihood of poor outcome in out-of-intensive care unit (ICU) patients with clinical suspicion of Sepsis. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 1,266 REFERENCES
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2016
TLDR
Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality. Expand
Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock
TLDR
Evidence-based recommendations can be made regarding many aspects of the acute management of sepsis and septic shock that are hoped to translate into improved outcomes for the critically ill patient. Expand
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock, 2012
TLDR
An update to the “Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock,” last published in 2008, is provided. Expand
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis*
TLDR
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care and a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates wasassociated with participation. Expand
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008
TLDR
To provide an update to the original Surviving Sepsis Campaign clinical management guidelines, the GRADE system was used to guide assessment of quality of evidence from high (A) to very low (D) and to determine the strength of recommendations. Expand
Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008
TLDR
The Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to guide assessment of quality of evidence from high to very low and to determine the strength of recommendations. Expand
Foreword. The Future of Sepsis Performance Improvement.
TLDR
The publication of the first International Guidelines for the Management of Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock in 2004 began a sustained effort to reduce sepsis mortality, which subsequently included collaboration with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement to develop “care bundles”. Expand
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis
TLDR
The Surviving Sepsis Campaign was associated with sustained, continuous quality improvement in sepsis care and a reduction in reported hospital mortality rates wasassociated with participation. Expand
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).
TLDR
The task force concluded the term severe sepsis was redundant and updated definitions and clinical criteria should replace previous definitions, offer greater consistency for epidemiologic studies and clinical trials, and facilitate earlier recognition and more timely management of patients with sepsi or at risk of developing sepsic shock. Expand
Practice parameters for hemodynamic support of sepsis in adult patients: 2004 update
TLDR
An organized approach to the hemodynamic support of sepsis was formulated, and specific recommendations for fluid resuscitation, vasopressor therapy, and inotropic therapy of septic in adult patients were promulgated. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...