• Corpus ID: 44842873

Survival of crowns and bridges related to luting cements.

@article{Black1990SurvivalOC,
  title={Survival of crowns and bridges related to luting cements.},
  author={S M Black and G. Charlton},
  journal={Restorative dentistry},
  year={1990},
  volume={6 3},
  pages={
          26-30
        }
}
The longevity of 782 items of crown and bridgework was investigated in a retrospective study. The effect of different cement lutes was assessed for periods varying from 70 to 89 months using a survival analysis technique. The analysis of all types of restoration showed slightly better survival figures for restorations cemented with polycarboxylate but were not statistically significant when compared with those cemented with glass-ionomer. However, those cemented with polycarboxylate were… 
View on PubMed
15 Citations
Background Citations
2

15 Citations

Citation Type

Citation Type

Ten years' clinical evaluation of three luting cements.
An up to 43-year longitudinal study of fixed prosthetic restorations retained with 4-META/MMA-TBB resin cement or zinc phosphate cement.
Prospective observation of a new bioactive luting cement: 2-year follow-up.
  • S. Jefferies, C. Pameijer, P. Glantz
  • Medicine, Materials Science
    Journal of prosthodontics : official journal of the American College of Prosthodontists
  • 2012
TLDR
Two-year recall data yielded no loss of retention, no secondary caries, no marginal discolorations, and no subjective sensitivity, and the new bioactive cement tested thus far has performed favorably as a luting agent for permanent cementation.
One year clinical performance and post-operative sensitivity of a bioactive dental luting cement--a prospective clinical study.
TLDR
The new cement was thus found to perform favorably as a luting agent for permanent cementation as well as being well within expected limits and that cement removal was easy.
Bonding of restorative materials to dentin with various luting agents.
TLDR
The luting agents had a bigger influence on bond strength between restorative materials and dentin than was seen with the restorative material and significant interaction was noted between the two variables.
Failure of dental bridges. II. Prevalence of failure and its relation to place of construction.
TLDR
In this investigation 156 dental bridges, constructed for 132 individuals, were evaluated and the results revealed that the rate of bridge failure averaged 35.5%.
Success and Survival of Various Types of All-Ceramic Single Crowns: A Critical Review and Analysis of Studies with a Mean Follow-Up of 5 Years or Longer.
TLDR
There was no evidence to support the superior application of a single ceramic system or material and further long-term prospective studies are required.
In patients requiring single-tooth replacement, what are the outcomes of implant- as compared to tooth-supported restorations?
  • T. Salinas, S. Eckert
  • Medicine, Materials Science
    The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants
  • 2007
TLDR
A systematic review of the literature failed to demonstrate any direct comparative studies assessing clinical performance of single implant-supported crowns and tooth-supported fixed partial dentures, and suggested differences at 60 months between survival of implants and natural tooth- supported fixed prostheses when resin-bonded and conventionally retained fixed prosthesis were grouped.
Clinical complications in fixed prosthodontics.
Meta-analysis of fixed partial denture survival: prostheses and abutments.
...
1
2
...