Surgical care improvement project in the value-based purchasing era: more harm than good?

Abstract

The Surgical Care Improvement Project (SCIP) started in 2006 as a core measure to reduce perioperative morbidity and mortality, with many measures addressing perioperative antibiotic usage and timing. However, measures are often rolled out without consideration of their full impact, causing confusion, frustration, and possibly patient harm. We have provided examples of each. The institution of SCIP has markedly increased the compliance to its measures but little evidence shows that it provides any substantial benefit to patients, whereas this improved compliance comes at the cost of significant time, money, and staff resources. Despite this, several SCIP measures, which are currently incorporated into quality contracts, will be tied to Medicare reimbursement in 2013 under value-based purchasing, with third-party payers likely following suit. This may lead to inappropriate lower compensation of hospitals providing good care with questionable effects on patient outcomes.

DOI: 10.1093/cid/cis940
0501002014201520162017
Citations per Year

58 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 58 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Weston2013SurgicalCI, title={Surgical care improvement project in the value-based purchasing era: more harm than good?}, author={Adam R W Weston and Kathleen Caldera and Shira Idit Doron}, journal={Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America}, year={2013}, volume={56 3}, pages={424-7} }