Surgery versus conservative care for neck pain: a systematic review

@article{Middelkoop2012SurgeryVC,
  title={Surgery versus conservative care for neck pain: a systematic review},
  author={M. Middelkoop and S. Rubinstein and R. Ostelo and M. Tulder and W. Peul and B. Koes and A. Verhagen},
  journal={European Spine Journal},
  year={2012},
  volume={22},
  pages={87-95}
}
  • M. Middelkoop, S. Rubinstein, +4 authors A. Verhagen
  • Published 2012
  • Medicine
  • European Spine Journal
  • ObjectiveGeneral practitioners refer patients with continued neck pain that do not respond well to conservative care frequently to secondary care for further assessment. Are surgical interventions to the cervical spine effective when compared to conservative care for patients with neck pain?DesignSystematic review.MethodThe search strategy outlined by the Cochrane Back Review Group (CBRG) was followed. The primary search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and PEDro up to June… CONTINUE READING
    28 Citations

    Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper.

    Effectiveness of manual therapy for cervical radiculopathy, a review
    • E. Thoomes
    • Medicine
    • Chiropractic & Manual Therapies
    • 2016
    • 9
    A randomised controlled trial comparing the effectiveness of surgical and nonsurgical treatment for cervical radiculopathy
    Acupotomy Therapy for Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    • 10
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 25 REFERENCES
    Surgery for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy.
    • 89
    Cochrane Review on the Role of Surgery in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculomyelopathy
    • 153
    Conservative treatment versus surgery in spondylotic cervical myelopathy: a prospective randomised study
    • 102
    • Highly Influential
    Plasma disc decompression for contained cervical disc herniation: a randomized, controlled trial
    • 34
    • Highly Influential
    Reduced pain after surgery for cervical disc protrusion/stenosis: a 2 year clinical follow-up
    • 14
    • Highly Influential