Surface Constraints versus Underlying Representation

@inproceedings{Burzio1996SurfaceCV,
  title={Surface Constraints versus Underlying Representation},
  author={Luigi Burzio},
  year={1996}
}
The shift from derivational rules to representational constraints that characterizes much contemporary work in phonology calls for a serious reevaluation of the notion of Underlying Representation (UR). The reason is that the ability of constraints to apply "in parallel" systematically obviates the need for a derivation. The purpose of this paper is to argue, consistently with my (1994) Principles of English Stress (PES), that the notion of UR is neither conceptually necessary nor empirically… CONTINUE READING

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 11 references

Phonologically conditioned suppletion

  • A. Carstairs
  • 1990
Highly Influential
1 Excerpt

On paradigmatic stress

  • N. Vincent
  • 1995
3 Excerpts

Kiparsky (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle

  • P. Anderson
  • New York: Holt Rinehart and Winston. Kenstowicz,
  • 1993

Constraining extrametricality

  • I. Roca
  • 1992
2 Excerpts

Morphology and the mental lexicon: psycholinguistic evidence

  • PhD Dissertation, B. Harvard. Derwing
  • Contemporary Morphology. New York: Mouton de…
  • 1990

Why Phonology Is Different

  • S. Bromberger, M. Halle
  • Linguistic Inquiry
  • 1989
1 Excerpt

Some implications of phonologically conditioned suppletion

  • A. Carstairs
  • 1988

Theory in Romance Linguistics (LSRL XXIII)

  • H.C.W. Dressler
  • In Yearbook of Morphology
  • 1988

English stress

  • L. Burzio
  • 1987
1 Excerpt

Loporcaro (eds.) Certamen Phonologicum

  • L. Burzio
  • English stress
  • 1987
2 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…