Supplemental Education Services Under No Child Left Behind

  title={Supplemental Education Services Under No Child Left Behind},
  author={Carolyn J. Heinrich and Robert H. Meyer and Gregory William Whitten},
  journal={Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis},
  pages={273 - 298}
Schools that have not made adequate yearly progress in increasing student academic achievement are required, under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), to offer children in low-income families the opportunity to receive supplemental educational services (SES). In research conducted in Milwaukee Public Schools, the authors explore whether parents and students are aware of their eligibility and options for extra tutoring under NCLB, and who among eligible students registers for SES. Using the best… 

Tables from this paper

The Efficacy of Private Sector Providers in Improving Public Educational Outcomes
School districts required under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) to provide supplemental educational services (SES) to students in schools that are not making adequate yearly progress rely heavily on the
Educational Choice and Student Participation
The Supplemental Educational Services (SES) provision of the No Child Left Behind Act offers free tutoring services to students attending perennially underperforming schools. The author assesses the
Impacts of Title I Supplemental Educational Services on Student Achievement. NCEE 2012-4053.
As part of No Child Left Behind, parents of low-income students in low-performing schools are offered Supplemental Educational Services (SES) for their children. These academic supports, such as
Effectiveness of Supplemental Educational Services
Abstract: One of the modifications of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (known as the No Child Left Behind Act) gave parents of low-income students in low-performing schools a choice of
No Child Left Behind and Tutoring in Reading and Mathematics: Impact of Supplemental Educational Services on Large Scale Assessment
This quantitative study evaluated the effects of Supplemental Educational Services (SES), a federally mandated component of No Child Left Behind, on student achievement in reading and mathematics.
Instruction Matters: Lessons from a Mixed-Method Evaluation of Out-Of-School Time Tutoring under No Child Left Behind
Background/Context Under supplemental educational services (“supplemental services”), a parental choice provision of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), schools that have not made adequate yearly
Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District
This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample
The Effects of No Child Left Behind on School Services and Student Outcomes. Conference Paper.
Under the No Child Le Behind Act (NCLB), in theory, schools on the margin for meeting AYP face strong short-term incentives to increase students’ pass rates on specific exams, and may change their
Characteristics of Supplemental Educational Services Providers That Explain Heterogeneity of Effects on Achievement
This study used a mixed-methods approach to explore the heterogeneity of effectiveness between supplemental educational services (SES) providers in the Chicago Public Schools (CPS). Using surveys of


Supplemental Educational Services under NCLB
In January 2002,President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind(NCLB) Act,the purpose of which is to improve the academic achievements of all the students,especially the disadvantaged ones in
Supplemental Educational Services and NCLB: Policy Assumptions, Market Practices, Emerging Issues
The supplemental educational services (SES) provision of No Child Left Behind introduces a federally mandated after-school tutoring intervention in schools that fail to make adequate yearly progress.
Federalism and Market‐Based Education Policy: The Supplemental Educational Services Mandate
  • S. Vergari
  • Political Science, Economics
    American Journal of Education
  • 2006
Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, school districts that receive federal Title 1 education funds and have a “school in need of improvement—year two” must implement supplemental educational
Case Studies of Supplemental Services Under the No Child Left Behind Act: Findings From 2003-04.
Those who use a telecommunications device for the deaf (TDD) or a teletypewriter (TTY), should call 1-800-437-0833. The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), signed into law in January 2002, provides for
The Impact of Language and High-Stakes Testing Policies on Elementary School English Language Learners in Arizona.
This article reports the results of a survey of third-grade teachers of English Language Learners (ELLs) in Arizona regarding school language and accountability policies—Proposition 203, which
Out-of-School-Time Programs: A Meta-Analysis of Effects for At-Risk Students
Schools and districts are adopting out-of-school-time (OST) programs such as after-school programs and summer schools to supplement the education of low-achieving students. However, research has
Gathering evidence on an after-school supplemental instruction program: Design challenges and early findings in light of NCLB.
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 requires that public schools adopt research-supported programs and practices, with a strong recommendation for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the
Charter School Quality and Parental Decision Making With School Choice
  • 2005
Performance Incentives: Their Growing Impact on American K-12 Education
The concept of pay for performance for public school teachers is growing in popularity and use, and it has resurged to once again occupy a central role in education policy. Performance Incentives:
Choice and Supplemental Services in America’s Great City Schools
The school district of Philadelphia is on the list of systems in Pennsylvania that are “in need of improvement.” Only 20 percent of the city’s fifth-graders met the state’s reading standards in 2002.