Supplemental Education Services Under No Child Left Behind

  title={Supplemental Education Services Under No Child Left Behind},
  author={Carolyn J. Heinrich and Robert H. Meyer and Gregory William Whitten},
  journal={Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis},
  pages={273 - 298}
Schools that have not made adequate yearly progress in increasing student academic achievement are required, under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), to offer children in low-income families the opportunity to receive supplemental educational services (SES). In research conducted in Milwaukee Public Schools, the authors explore whether parents and students are aware of their eligibility and options for extra tutoring under NCLB, and who among eligible students registers for SES. Using the best… 

Tables from this paper

The Efficacy of Private Sector Providers in Improving Public Educational Outcomes

School districts required under No Child Left Behind (NCLB) to provide supplemental educational services (SES) to students in schools that are not making adequate yearly progress rely heavily on the

Educational Choice and Student Participation

The Supplemental Educational Services (SES) provision of the No Child Left Behind Act offers free tutoring services to students attending perennially underperforming schools. The author assesses the

Impacts of Title I Supplemental Educational Services on Student Achievement. NCEE 2012-4053.

As part of No Child Left Behind, parents of low-income students in low-performing schools are offered Supplemental Educational Services (SES) for their children. These academic supports, such as

Effectiveness of Supplemental Educational Services

Abstract: One of the modifications of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (known as the No Child Left Behind Act) gave parents of low-income students in low-performing schools a choice of

No Child Left Behind and Tutoring in Reading and Mathematics: Impact of Supplemental Educational Services on Large Scale Assessment

This quantitative study evaluated the effects of Supplemental Educational Services (SES), a federally mandated component of No Child Left Behind, on student achievement in reading and mathematics.

Instruction Matters: Lessons from a Mixed-Method Evaluation of Out-Of-School Time Tutoring under No Child Left Behind

Background/Context Under supplemental educational services (“supplemental services”), a parental choice provision of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB), schools that have not made adequate yearly

Supplemental Educational Services and Student Test Score Gains: Evidence from a Large, Urban School District

This study examines the effect of supplemental education services (SES) on student test score gains and whether particular subgroups of students benefit more from NCLB tutoring services. Our sample

A Meta-Analysis of Supplemental Educational Services in Ohio: Implications for the Reauthorization of ESEA.

The Supplemental Educational Services (SES) policy, under No Child Left Behind, requires underperforming Title I schools to offer academic tutoring to eligible students. A meta-analysis of findings

The Effects of No Child Left Behind on School Services and Student Outcomes. Conference Paper.

Under the No Child Le Behind Act (NCLB), in theory, schools on the margin for meeting AYP face strong short-term incentives to increase students’ pass rates on specific exams, and may change their



Supplemental Educational Services under NCLB

In January 2002,President Bush signed the No Child Left Behind(NCLB) Act,the purpose of which is to improve the academic achievements of all the students,especially the disadvantaged ones in

Supplemental Educational Services and NCLB: Policy Assumptions, Market Practices, Emerging Issues

The supplemental educational services (SES) provision of No Child Left Behind introduces a federally mandated after-school tutoring intervention in schools that fail to make adequate yearly progress.

Federalism and Market‐Based Education Policy: The Supplemental Educational Services Mandate

  • S. Vergari
  • Political Science, Economics
    American Journal of Education
  • 2006
Under the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, school districts that receive federal Title 1 education funds and have a “school in need of improvement—year two” must implement supplemental educational

The Impact of Language and High-Stakes Testing Policies on Elementary School English Language Learners in Arizona.

This article reports the results of a survey of third-grade teachers of English Language Learners (ELLs) in Arizona regarding school language and accountability policies—Proposition 203, which

Out-of-School-Time Programs: A Meta-Analysis of Effects for At-Risk Students

Schools and districts are adopting out-of-school-time (OST) programs such as after-school programs and summer schools to supplement the education of low-achieving students. However, research has

Gathering evidence on an after-school supplemental instruction program: Design challenges and early findings in light of NCLB.

The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001 requires that public schools adopt research-supported programs and practices, with a strong recommendation for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) as the

Performance Incentives: Their Growing Impact on American K-12 Education

The concept of pay for performance for public school teachers is growing in popularity and use, and it has resurged to once again occupy a central role in education policy. Performance Incentives:

Choice and Supplemental Services in America’s Great City Schools

The school district of Philadelphia is on the list of systems in Pennsylvania that are “in need of improvement.” Only 20 percent of the city’s fifth-graders met the state’s reading standards in 2002.

State and Local Implementation of the No Child Left Behind Act: Volume I -- Title I School Choice, Supplemental Educational Services, and Student Achievement

present previously published journal articles, book chapters, and reports with the permission of the publisher. RAND reprints have been formally reviewed in accordance with the publisher's editorial

How effective are one-to-one tutoring programs in reading for elementary students at risk for reading failure? A meta-analysis of the intervention research

A meta-analysis of supplemental, adult-instructed one-to-one reading interventions for elementary students at risk for reading failure was conducted. Reading outcomes for 42 samples of students (N =