Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate

@article{Mayhew2003SupermajorityRI,
  title={Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate},
  author={David R. Mayhew},
  journal={PS: Political Science \& Politics},
  year={2003},
  volume={36},
  pages={31 - 36}
}
  • David R. Mayhew
  • Published 1 January 2003
  • History
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
For this occasion, I decided to tackle a topic of, I hope, some historical and theoretical interest, of current policy importance and one that might have interested James Madison.I would like to thank Alan Gerber and Eric Schickler for their help on this work. A useful clarifying point came from Morris Fiorina. Matthew Glassman helped with the references. That topic is supermajority rule in the U.S. Senate—that is, the need to win more than a simple majority of senators to pass laws. Great… 

Senate Deliberation and the Future of Congressional Power

  • Frances E. Lee
  • Political Science
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2010
Current circumstances might seem to present real opportunities for Congress to reassert itself relative to its weakened role during George W. Bush's presidency. Large, unusually cohesive Democratic

The Nuclear Option for Stopping Filibusters

  • R. Klotz
  • Political Science
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2004
They did not seem to be in a position to help the other body. Yet, on October 10, 2002, members of the House Judiciary Committee listened to witnesses discuss how the Senate could be more efficient.

The forum

This is a rare opportunity to hear from the leaders of the nation's largest companies and organizations regarding the basic philosophy and driving principles that these institutions use as they plan for the future.

Converting Threats into Opportunities

  • E. Ostrom
  • Environmental Science
    PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2006
James Madison contributed much to political science and to the art and science of governing democratic regimes. A major contribution was his recognition of the multiple threats facing the newly

Intensity, Effort, Endogenous Rules and Obstruction in the U.s. Senate

The relationship between parliamentary rules and legislative outcomes is a central question in the study of Congress. A well-established and fruitful approach to this question interprets

Special Majorities Rationalized

Complaints are common about the arbitrary and conservative bias of special-majority rules. Such complaints, however, apply to asymmetrical versions of those rules alone. Symmetrical special-majority

The Filibuster as a War of Attrition

Contrary to popular claims, we argue that the filibuster conveys meaningful information about participants’ willingness to fight for an issue. To this end, we present a model of the filibuster as a

Preferences, Parties, and Legislative Productivity

Chiou and Rothenberg (2003) utilized models of legislative productivity, synthesizing parties and preferences by deriving and measuring different equilibrium gridlock intervals, finding that such

Is Senatorial Leadership even possible? The Deadlock of the American Upper Chamber

Checks and balances, the founding principle of American institutions, are not only found in the constant inter-branch dialog but also in Congress, where the bicameral division was initially meant by the Founding Fathers as an internal check within the lawmaking process.

Unpacking pivotal politics: exploring the differential effects of the filibuster and veto pivots

Formal models of politics regularly combine assumptions about a variety of actors and institutions to produce equilibrium expectations, which serve as the primary target for empirical testing. Yet

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES

Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress By Eric Schickler. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 356p. $65.00 cloth, $22.95 paper.

  • D. King
  • Political Science
    American Political Science Review
  • 2002
For those of us who watch Congress and steep ourselves in its history, there are a handful of theories purporting to explain how and why Congress changes. Political parties behave like cartels

Where's the Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-cloture Senate

This article employs a three-pronged approach to test competing theories regarding the size of coalitions required for passing legislation prior to the adoption of cloture in the Senate. We compare

Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court-packing Plan

I show the intimate connection between the actions of the justices and support for the Supreme Court during one of the most critical periods of U.S. political history, the four months of 1937 during

Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking

Politicians and pundits alike have complained that the divided governments of the last decades have led to a legislative gridlock. The author argues against this, advancing the theory that divided

Second and Third Sessions of the Seventy-fifth Congress, 1937–38.

The election returns of November, 1936, seemed to portray a democracy strongly united behind a leader and a program of action. It appeared that Franklin D. Roosevelt and his New Deal platform had

America's Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison Through Newt Gingrich

To understand American politics and government, we need to recognize not only that members of Congress are agents of societal interests and preferences but also that they act with a certain degree of

Politics or Principle?: Filibustering in the United States Senate

Is American democracy being derailed by the United States Senate filibuster? Is the filibuster an important right that improves the political process or an increasingly partisan tool that delays

Parliament

Participation in Congress

For every issue that arises on the legislative agenda, each member of Congress must make two decisions: What position to take and how active to be. The first has been thoroughly studied. But little

The art of political manipulation

In twelve entertaining stories from history and current events, a noted political scientist and game theorist shows us how some of our heroes we as well as ordinary folk have manipulated their