Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate

  title={Supermajority Rule in the U.S. Senate},
  author={David R. Mayhew},
  journal={PS: Political Science \& Politics},
  pages={31 - 36}
  • David R. Mayhew
  • Published 1 January 2003
  • Political Science
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
For this occasion, I decided to tackle a topic of, I hope, some historical and theoretical interest, of current policy importance and one that might have interested James Madison.I would like to thank Alan Gerber and Eric Schickler for their help on this work. A useful clarifying point came from Morris Fiorina. Matthew Glassman helped with the references. That topic is supermajority rule in the U.S. Senate—that is, the need to win more than a simple majority of senators to pass laws. Great… Expand
Senate Deliberation and the Future of Congressional Power
  • Frances E. Lee
  • Political Science
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2010
Current circumstances might seem to present real opportunities for Congress to reassert itself relative to its weakened role during George W. Bush's presidency. Large, unusually cohesive DemocraticExpand
The Nuclear Option for Stopping Filibusters
  • R. Klotz
  • Political Science
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2004
They did not seem to be in a position to help the other body. Yet, on October 10, 2002, members of the House Judiciary Committee listened to witnesses discuss how the Senate could be more efficient.Expand
Converting Threats into Opportunities
  • E. Ostrom
  • Political Science
  • PS: Political Science & Politics
  • 2006
James Madison contributed much to political science and to the art and science of governing democratic regimes. A major contribution was his recognition of the multiple threats facing the newlyExpand
Intensity, Effort, Endogenous Rules and Obstruction in the U.s. Senate
The relationship between parliamentary rules and legislative outcomes is a central question in the study of Congress. A well-established and fruitful approach to this question interpretsExpand
Special majorities rationalized
Complaints are common about the arbitrary and conservative bias of special-majority rules. Such complaints, however, apply to asymmetrical versions of those rules alone. Symmetrical special-majorityExpand
The Filibuster as a War of Attrition
Contrary to popular claims, we argue that the filibuster conveys meaningful information about participants’ willingness to fight for an issue. To this end, we present a model of the filibuster as aExpand
Preferences, Parties, and Legislative Productivity
Chiou and Rothenberg (2003) utilized models of legislative productivity, synthesizing parties and preferences by deriving and measuring different equilibrium gridlock intervals, finding that suchExpand
Is Senatorial Leadership even possible? The Deadlock of the American Upper Chamber
Checks and balances, the founding principle of American institutions, are not only found in the constant inter-branch dialog but also in Congress, where the bicameral division was initially meant by the Founding Fathers as an internal check within the lawmaking process. Expand
Unpacking pivotal politics: exploring the differential effects of the filibuster and veto pivots
Formal models of politics regularly combine assumptions about a variety of actors and institutions to produce equilibrium expectations, which serve as the primary target for empirical testing. YetExpand
The Filibuster: A Means to Preserve the Voice of “We the People”
The Senatorial practice of the filibuster has a long history of being an established fixture in the U.S. Senate. The filibuster, a senatorial tool and tactic of extended or unlimited debate has aExpand


Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress By Eric Schickler. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2001. 356p. $65.00 cloth, $22.95 paper.
  • D. King
  • Economics
  • American Political Science Review
  • 2002
For those of us who watch Congress and steep ourselves in its history, there are a handful of theories purporting to explain how and why Congress changes. Political parties behave like cartelsExpand
Where's the Pivot? Obstruction and Lawmaking in the Pre-cloture Senate
This article employs a three-pronged approach to test competing theories regarding the size of coalitions required for passing legislation prior to the adoption of cloture in the Senate. We compareExpand
Public Opinion and the U.S. Supreme Court: FDR's Court-packing Plan
I show the intimate connection between the actions of the justices and support for the Supreme Court during one of the most critical periods of U.S. political history, the four months of 1937 duringExpand
Pivotal Politics: A Theory of U.S. Lawmaking
Politicians and pundits alike have complained that the divided governments of the last decades have led to a legislative gridlock. The author argues against this, advancing the theory that dividedExpand
America's Congress: Actions in the Public Sphere, James Madison Through Newt Gingrich
To understand American politics and government, we need to recognize not only that members of Congress are agents of societal interests and preferences but also that they act with a certain degree ofExpand
Politics or Principle?: Filibustering in the United States Senate
Is American democracy being derailed by the United States Senate filibuster? Is the filibuster an important right that improves the political process or an increasingly partisan tool that delaysExpand
This does at first glance seem to be the one field where almost all could agree that the Tories have, within the limits of economic realism, got their spending broadly right. Expand
Participation in Congress
For every issue that arises on the legislative agenda, each member of Congress must make two decisions: What position to take and how active to be. The first has been thoroughly studied. But littleExpand
The art of political manipulation
In twelve entertaining stories from history and current events, a noted political scientist and game theorist shows us how some of our heroes we as well as ordinary folk have manipulated theirExpand
Master of the Senate: The Years of Lyndon Johnson, Volume 3 (review)
Lyndon Johnson had a complex relationship with the South. Although his power depended on the backing of southern leaders, Johnson feared that too close of an association with the South would preventExpand