• Corpus ID: 153238607

Superior responsibility and crimes of specific intent : a disconnect in legal reasoning?

@inproceedings{Wood2013SuperiorRA,
  title={Superior responsibility and crimes of specific intent : a disconnect in legal reasoning?},
  author={Pa Wood},
  year={2013}
}
  • P. Wood
  • Published 4 September 2013
  • Law
This dissertation examines the nature of superior responsibility, as a mode of criminal responsibility, and its applicability to crimes of specific intent. Specifically, the mens rea of superior responsibility is analysed in relation to the mens rea of crimes that require specific intent. Thus, the question arises whether a superior may be held accountable, in terms of superior responsibility, for crimes of specific intent. It is argued that a superior cannot be held accountable for specific… 
1 Citations

A RESPONSABILIDADE PENAL DOS SUPERIORES HIERÁRQUICOS E A EXIGÊNCIA DE CONTRIBUIÇÃO CAUSAL PARA OS CORE CRIMES COMETIDOS PELOS SUBORDINADOS

O presente estudo visa analisar se a responsabilidade do superior hierarquico e uma forma de participacao nos crimes cometidos pelos subordinados, um crime autonomo ou, ainda, uma nova modalidade de

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 46 REFERENCES

Command Responsibility: Mode of Liability for the Crimes of Subordinates or Separate Offence of the Superior?

The nature of command responsibility is still open to debate in international criminal law: is a superior to be held criminally responsible for the crimes committed by his subordinates as an

The International Criminal Court and the Concept of Mens Rea in International Criminal Law

The concept of mens rea defined in Article 30 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court is not founded on the typical Anglo-American perceptions of fault, and concepts such as “malice

Understanding Mens Rea in Command Responsibility From Yamashita to Blaškić and Beyond

Despite 50 years of doctrinal evolution, the mens rea for command responsibility is still unclear. Four factors help explain this. First, international courts frequently borrow mens rea terminology

Finding a Proper Role for Command Responsibility

This article examines the role that command responsibility currently plays in the case law of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and the International Criminal

Guilty Associations: Joint Criminal Enterprise, Command Responsibility, and the Development of International Criminal Law

Contemporary international criminal law is largely concerned with holding individual defendants responsible for mass atrocities. Because the crimes usually involve the concerted efforts of many

The Statute of the International Criminal Court: Some Preliminary Reflections

The author appraises the contribution of the International Criminal Court (ICC) to substantive and procedural international criminal law. He portrays it as a revolutionary innovation. Its substantive

Mens rea – Mistake of Law & Mistake of Fact in German Criminal Law: A Survey for International Criminal Tribunals

More than a decade has passed since the establishment of the two ad hoc Tribunals, however, the jurisprudence of both Tribunals evidence the inconsistency regarding the requisite mens rea standards

Joint Criminal Enterprise and Command Responsibility

The joint criminal enterprise doctrine appears more and more as the magic weapon in the prosecution of international crimes. Yet, the doctrine not only gives rise to conceptual confusion and

Dolus eventualis and the Rome statute without it

Article 30 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court provides a general definition for the mental element required to trigger the criminal responsibility of individuals for serious

General Principles of Criminal Law in the Rome Statute

The following paper has a limited objective. It describes and critically analyses the general principles of the Rome Statute (arts. 22–33). The drafting history of these provisions has been described