Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published

@article{Grimm2005SuggestingOE,
  title={Suggesting or Excluding Reviewers Can Help Get Your Paper Published},
  author={D. Grimm},
  journal={Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={309},
  pages={1974 - 1974}
}
  • D. Grimm
  • Published 2005
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Science
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS-- According to three studies presented here last week at the Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, either suggesting or excluding reviewers can significantly increase a manuscript9s chances of being accepted. 

Topics from this paper

Does Publication in Top-Tier Journals Affect Reviewer Behavior?
TLDR
The results indicate that the likelihood of getting a paper accepted for publication may depend upon factors in addition to scientific merit and multiple reviewer selection for a given manuscript should consider not only appropriate expertise, but also reviewers that have variable publication experience with a range of different journals to ensure balanced treatment. Expand
Do Author-Suggested Reviewers Rate Submissions More Favorably than Editor-Suggested Reviewers? A Study on Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
TLDR
Journal editors should consider either doing without the use of author-suggested reviewers or, if they are used, bringing in more than one editor- Suggested reviewer for the review process (so that the review by author-Suggested reviewers can be put in perspective). Expand
How to write an article: Preparing a publishable manuscript!
TLDR
This DIY (Do It Yourself) article on how to achieve that goal is an extension of the symposium presented at the 36th European Congress of Cytology, Istanbul, Turkey. Expand
A Step by Step Guide to Writing a Scientific Manuscript
About 50% of abstracts presented at conferences get published as full manuscripts. This manuscript is a hands-on instruction on how to publish a scientific investigation. Criteria for authorshipExpand
Current Controversies Regarding Peer Review in Scholarly Journals
TLDR
Concerns about other aspects of the traditional peer review process include reviewer bias, conflicts of interest, and even outright scams in which authors were caught reviewing their own papers or manipulating the review process by suggesting cronies as reviewers are offered. Expand
[How do I write an original article? An introduction for beginners].
TLDR
This manuscript is a hands-on instruction on how to collate a scientific investigation into an article and issues that are absolutely to be avoided are insufficient preparation of the study, no answers to the hypothesis of theStudy, contradictions within the manuscript, superficial discussion, changing terms, reflexive sentences, and a conclusion that is not supported by the data. Expand
Peer review and journal models
Tentative analysis of alternative peer review and journal models. Open Access and Impact factor issues are not covered. The bibliography, in alphabetical order, lists articles and web sites (withExpand
Making Sense of Non-Financial Competing Interests
  • Medicine
  • PLoS medicine
  • 2008
TLDR
Private competing interests are perhaps even more potent than financial ones in the publication of research, and the very nature of academic and editorial work ensures that none of us are immune. Expand
Encouragement to contribute to peer-review process in clinical neurology journals
TLDR
Whether the chance of peer-review assignment as expected from the amount of publications in "Japanese" and "Arabic" investigators differed from that for "Other" investigators in mainstream clinical neurology journals in 2004 is investigated. Expand
IN THE PRESSURE OF ACADEMIC PUBLISHING: CALL FOR MORE ACCURATE, CONSTRUCTIVE, AND FASTER REVIEWS
TLDR
The purpose of the study was to analyze peer-referees’ commentaries in order to find out whether the review practice could be advanced or developed based on the findings. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
...