Subtle syntactic cues affect intuitions about knowledge: Methodological and theoretical implications for epistemology

@inproceedings{Horne2018SubtleSC,
  title={Subtle syntactic cues affect intuitions about knowledge: Methodological and theoretical implications for epistemology},
  author={Z. Horne and Andrei Cimpian},
  year={2018}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 55 REFERENCES
Intuition Fail: Philosophical Activity and the Limits of Expertise
Experimental philosophers have empirically challenged the connection between intuition and philosophical expertise. This paper reviews these challenges alongside other research findings in cognitiveExpand
Knowledge, stakes, and mistakes
To illustrate, Folk stakes sensitivity says that all else equal, people are less likely to say that Sarah knows that her health insurance is current, if she is about to get hit by a bus and incurExpand
Philosophers are doing something different now: Quantitative data
  • J. Knobe
  • Sociology, Medicine
  • Cognition
  • 2015
TLDR
Overall, the results of the review suggest that the philosophical study of mind has become considerably more integrated into the broader interdisciplinary field of cognitive science. Expand
Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection
TLDR
For these scenario types, neither framing effects nor order effects appear to be reduced even by high levels of academic expertise. Expand
Reference in the Land of the Rising Sun: A Cross-cultural Study on the Reference of Proper Names
A standard methodology in philosophy of language is to use intuitions as evidence. Machery, Mallon, Nichols, and Stich (2004) challenged this methodology with respect to theories of reference byExpand
5. Essence and Natural Kinds: When Science Meets Preschooler Intuition 1
It is common practice in philosophy to “rely on intuitions” in the course of an argument, or sometimes simply to establish a conclusion. One question that is therefore important to settle is: what isExpand
Explanatory anti-psychologism overturned by lay and scientific case classifications
Many philosophers of science follow Hempel in embracing both substantive and methodological anti-psychologism regarding the study of explanation. The former thesis denies that explanations areExpand
God knows (but does God believe?)
The standard view in epistemology is that propositional knowledge entails belief. Positive arguments are seldom given for this entailment thesis, however; instead, its truth is typically assumed.Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...