• Corpus ID: 34710375

# Subtle and Ineffable Tree Properties

@inproceedings{Wei2010SubtleAI,
title={Subtle and Ineffable Tree Properties},
author={Christoph Wei{\ss}},
year={2010}
}
• C. Weiß
• Published 22 April 2010
• Mathematics
In the style of the tree property, we give combinatorial principles that capture the concepts of the so-called subtle and ineffable cardinals in such a way that they are also applicable to small cardinals. Building upon these principles we then develop a further one that even achieves this for supercompactness. We show the consistency of these principles starting from the corresponding large cardinals. Furthermore we show the equiconsistency for subtle and ineffable. For supercompactness…

### The ineffable tree property and failure of the singular cardinals hypothesis

• Mathematics
• 2020
A long standing project in set theory is to analyze how much compactness can be obtained in the universe. Compactness is the phenomenon where if a certain property holds for all small substructures

### The super tree property at the successor of a singular

• Mathematics
Israel Journal of Mathematics
• 2020
For an inaccessible cardinal κ , the super tree property (ITP) at κ holds if and only if κ is supercomact. However, just like the tree property, it can hold at successor cardinals. We show that ITP

### THE STRONG TREE PROPERTY AT SUCCESSORS OF SINGULAR CARDINALS

It is proved that if there is a model of ZFC with infinitely many supercompact cardinals, then there is the strong tree property of Z FC where ${\aleph _{\omega + 1}}$ has theStrong tree property.

### Characterizing large cardinals through Neeman's pure side condition forcing

• Mathematics
Fundamenta Mathematicae
• 2021
We show that some of the most prominent large cardinal notions can be characterized through the validity of certain combinatorial principles at $\omega_2$ in forcing extensions by the pure side

### The Strong and Super Tree Property at Successors of Singular Cardinals

. The strong tree property and ITP (also called the super tree property) are generalizations of the tree property that characterize strong compactness and supercompactness up to inaccessibility. That

### Split Principles, large cardinals, splitting families and split ideals

• Mathematics
• 2017
We introduce split principles and show that their negations provide simple combinatorial characterizations of large cardinal properties. As examples, we show how inaccessiblity, weak compactness,

### MRP, tree properties and square principles

It is shown that MRP + MA implies that ITP(λ,ω2) holds for all cardinal λ ≥ ω2.

## References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 22 REFERENCES

### The tree property at successors of singular cardinals

• Mathematics
Arch. Math. Log.
• 1996
It is shown that if $\ lambda$ is a singular limit of strongly compact cardinals, then $\lambda^+$ carries no Aronszajn trees.

### Hierarchies of forcing axioms I

• Mathematics
Journal of Symbolic Logic
• 2008
The results are in terms of (θ, Γ)-subcompactness, which is a new large cardinal notion that combines the ideas behind subCompactness and Γ-indescribability.

### Forcing indestructibility of set-theoretic axioms

It is shown in particular that certain applications of forcing axioms require to add generic countable sequences high up in the set-theoretic hierarchy even before collapsing everything down to ℵ1.

### Reflecting stationary sets and successors of singular cardinals

It is shown that supercompactness (and even the failure of PT) implies the existence of non-reflecting stationary sets, and that under suitable assumptions it is consistent that REF and there is a κ which is κ+n-supercompact.

### Combinatorial characterization of supercompact cardinals

It is proved that supercompact cardinals can be characterized by combinatorial properties which are generalizations of ineffability. 0. Introduction. A A B is the symmetric difference of A and B.

### Combinatorial principles in the core model for one Woodin

• Mathematics
• 1995
We study the fine structure of the core model for one Woodin cardinal, building of the work of Mitchell and Steel on inner models of the form L[B]. We generalize to L[E] some combinatorial principles

### Fragments of Martin's Maximum in generic extensions

• Chemistry, Mathematics
Math. Log. Q.
• 2004
We show that large fragments of MM, e. g. the tree property and stationary reflection, are preserved by strongly (ω1 + 1)‐game‐closed forcings. PFA can be destroyed by a strongly (ω1 + 1)‐game‐closed

### A general Mitchell style iteration

We work out the details of a schema for a mixed support forcing iteration, which generalizes the Mitchell model [7] with no Aronszajn trees on ω2. (© 2008 WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

### The proper forcing axiom and the singular cardinal hypothesis

• M. Viale
• Philosophy
Journal of Symbolic Logic
• 2006
Abstract We show that the Proper Forcing Axiom implies the Singular Cardinal Hypothesis. The proof uses the reflection principle MRP introduced by Moore in [11].