Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms

  title={Subliminal anchoring: Judgmental consequences and underlying mechanisms},
  author={Thomas Mussweiler and Birte Englich},
  journal={Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes},

Figures from this paper

Big Raccoons and Small Giraffes : Anchoring in Sequential Judgments

We explore the extent of anchoring when respondents render multiple judgments sequentially a situation that commonly arises in surveys. We also examine the effect of more than one anchor, to test

Anchoring and Judgment Bias: Disregarding Under Uncertainty

The specific aim of the experiment was to examine whether people exhibit patterns of behavior consistent with anchoring effects, revealed by corrupted subjective judgments, despite explicit notice of instruction to disregard the experimenter-supplied information (the anchor).

Power Increases Anchoring Effects on Judgment

Four experiments test the impact of power (versus powerlessness) on anchoring effects. Anchoring refers to the tendency to assimilate one's judgment to a previously considered numeric standard. Based

Prime Numbers: Anchoring and its Implications for Theories of Behavior Priming

Subtle primes can influence behavior, often in ways that seem irrational. Anchoring provides a compelling illustration of this: judgments can be influenced by anchors even when the anchors are known

When relevance matters: anchoring effects can be larger for relevant than for irrelevant anchors

Studies on anchoring effects indicate that judgments can be biased by previous comparisons to high- or low-anchor values. Anchoring effects have been demonstrated in many domains and they have been

Compound Anchors and Their Subsequent Effects on Judgments

In this article, the authors first demonstrate the applicability of a standard anchoring paradigm to situations where both the anchor and subsequent target are compound concepts (Study 1). They next

A Sticky Space Model for Explanation and Individuation of Anchoring Effects

It is argued that by focusing on the mechanisms involved in spatial representation, it can account for most anchoring effects which have spatial components.



Comparing Is Believing: A Selective Accessibility Model of Judgmental Anchoring

Judgmental anchoring constitutes an ubiquitous and robust phenomenon. Nevertheless, its underlying mechanisms remain somewhat mysterious. We discuss four accounts that attempt to explain anchoring

Considering The Impossible: Explaining The Effects of Implausible Anchors

Research on judgmental anchoring - the assimilation of a numeric estimate towards a previously considered standard - has demonstrated that implausible anchors produce large effects. We propose an

A new look at anchoring effects: basic anchoring and its antecedents.

Five studies supported the hypothesis that basic anchoring effects can occur, whereby uninformative numerical anchors influence a judgment even when people are not asked to compare this number to the target value.

Anchoring, Activation, and the Construction of Values.

  • ChapmanJohnson
  • Psychology
    Organizational behavior and human decision processes
  • 1999
This work suggests that anchors affect judgments by increasing the availability and construction of features that the anchor and target hold in common and reducing the availability of features of the target that differ from the anchor.

The fragile basic anchoring effect

The anchoring bias, the effect of uninformative anchor numbers on judgments, is a robust finding. In experiments yielding the anchoring bias, typically participants are explicitly asked to compare

Implications of Attitude Change Theories for Numerical Anchoring: Anchor Plausibility and the Limits of Anchor Effectiveness

Abstract Effects of extreme versus moderate numerical anchors are investigated. Similar to past results in attitude change, three separate data collections show that extreme anchors can have less

Overcoming the Inevitable Anchoring Effect: Considering the Opposite Compensates for Selective Accessibility

Anchoring effects—the assimilation of a numeric estimate to a previously considered standard—have proved to be remarkably robust. Results of two studies, however, demonstrate that anchoring can be

Hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming in the anchoring paradigm: A selective accessibility model.

Results of four studies support the notion that anchoring effects are mediated by mechanisms of hypothesis-consistent testing and semantic priming. According to the suggested Selective Accessibility

Putting Adjustment Back in the Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic: Differential Processing of Self-Generated and Experimenter-Provided Anchors

Evidence is presented that insufficient adjustment produces anchoring effects when the anchors are self-generated, and it is suggested it is time to reintroduce anchoring and adjustment as an explanation for some judgments under uncertainty.

Are Adjustments Insufficient?

Evidence is provided of adjustment-based Anchoring effects similar to the accessibility-based anchoring effects observed in the traditional anchoring paradigm, supporting theories of social judgment that rely on mechanisms of insufficient adjustment.