Subgroup analyses in cost-effectiveness analyses to support health technology assessments.

@article{Fletcher2014SubgroupAI,
  title={Subgroup analyses in cost-effectiveness analyses to support health technology assessments.},
  author={Christine Fletcher and Christy Chuang-Stein and Marie-Ange Paget and Carol Reid and Neil Hawkins},
  journal={Pharmaceutical statistics},
  year={2014},
  volume={13 4},
  pages={
          265-74
        }
}
'Success' in drug development is bringing to patients a new medicine that has an acceptable benefit-risk profile and that is also cost-effective. Cost-effectiveness means that the incremental clinical benefit is deemed worth paying for by a healthcare system, and it has an important role in enabling manufacturers to obtain new medicines to patients as soon as possible following regulatory approval. Subgroup analyses are increasingly being utilised by decision-makers in the determination of the… 
Merging regulatory and reimbursement needs in clinical trials.
  • J. Cook
  • Medicine
    Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
  • 2015
(Cost-)effectiveness of lower extremity nerve decompression surgery in subjects with diabetes: the DeCompression (DECO) trial—study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
TLDR
The aim of the DeCompression trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and (cost-)effectiveness of surgical decompression of compressed lower extremity nerves (LEND surgery) compared with patients treated with conventional (non-surgical) care.
Factors Limiting Subgroup Analysis in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis and a Call for Transparency
TLDR
The factors that limit subgroup analysis in cost-effectiveness analysis are discussed, more thorough and transparent reporting is proposed and greater transparency of subgroup reporting is suggested to provide a starting point to overcoming challenges in future research.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 19 REFERENCES
Subgroups and Heterogeneity in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis
  • M. Sculpher
  • Medicine, Political Science
    PharmacoEconomics
  • 2012
TLDR
The use of subgroup analysis in cost-effectiveness analysis raises a number of methodological questions that have been given little consideration in the literature, and NICE needed to consider these and other issues when updating its methods guidance.
Subgroup analyses of clinical effectiveness to support health technology assessments.
TLDR
Good statistical principles for subgroup analyses of clinical effectiveness to support HTAs are described and case examples where HTA recommendations were given to subpopulations only are included.
Reimbursement and value-based pricing: stratified cost-effectiveness analysis may not be the last word.
TLDR
It is demonstrated that combinations of extended coverage and reduced price can be identified that are advantageous to both payers and manufacturers.
Decision Modelling for Health Economic Evaluation
TLDR
This book deals with decision modelling techniques that can be used to estimate the value for money of various interventions including medical devices, surgical procedures, diagnostic technologies, and pharmaceuticals.
Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy.
TLDR
Increasing the supply of pragmatic or practical clinical trials will depend on the development of a mechanism to establish priorities for these studies, significant expansion of an infrastructure to conduct clinical research within the health care delivery system, more reliance on high-quality evidence by health care decision makers, and a substantial increase in public and private funding forThese studies.
The development of health technology assessment.
  • D. Banta
  • Political Science, Medicine
    Health policy
  • 2003
CLINICAL HETEROGENEITY IN SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS AND HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS: SYNTHESIS OF GUIDANCE DOCUMENTS AND THE LITERATURE
TLDR
Identifying potential modifiers of treatment effects (i.e., effect-measure modifiers) is important for researchers conducting systematic reviews and HTAs and recognizing clinical heterogeneity and clarifying its implications helps decision makers to identify patients and patient populations who benefit the most, who benefits the least, and who are at greatest risk of experiencing adverse outcomes from a particular intervention.
How should we deal with patient heterogeneity in economic evaluation: a systematic review of national pharmacoeconomic guidelines.
  • B. Ramaekers, M. Joore, J. Grutters
  • Medicine, Political Science
    Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
  • 2013
Prioritizing pharmacogenetic research: a value of information analysis of CYP2D6 testing to guide breast cancer treatment.
  • B. Woods, D. Veenstra, N. Hawkins
  • Medicine
    Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research
  • 2011
Bayesian methods in health technology assessment: a review.
TLDR
A full structured review of applications of Bayesian methods to randomised controlled trials, observational studies, and the synthesis of evidence, in a form which should be reasonably straightforward to update is provided.
...
1
2
...