Studies in the Use of Myth in Sophocles' ‘Philoctetes’ and the ‘Orestes’ of Euripides

@article{Fuqua1976StudiesIT,
  title={Studies in the Use of Myth in Sophocles' ‘Philoctetes’ and the ‘Orestes’ of Euripides},
  author={Charles L. Fuqua},
  journal={Tradition},
  year={1976},
  volume={32},
  pages={29-95}
}
The following study is an examination of selected aspects of the mythical paradigms presented in Sophocles' Philoctetes and Euripides' Orestes in an attempt to define the concerns that are shared by these two very different dramas. The first part deals with the characterization of Neoptolemus in the Philoctetes and discusses how the dramatist departed from the customary view of this character and appears to have been influenced by the figure of Telemachus in the Odyssey. The following section… 
Neoptolemus grows up? 'Moral development' and the interpretation of sophocles' Philoctetes
Sophocles' Philoctetes , first performed in 409 BCE, is a complex play, engaging with a number of issues that have guaranteed it a great deal of attention through the ages. Among other things, from
La estructura del Orestes de Eurípides y el enigmático relato del frigio
Euripides divides Orestes in two parts around the mechanema , in such a way that the second one implies a reinterpretation of the first one. To this structure it is superimposed a chronological
El relato de mensajero en el Orestes de Eurípides
Orestes includes two messenger’s speeches, each one placed in each of the two parts of the play, into which it is possible to divide the tragedy. Both speeches are peculiar in opposition to the
Ancestral Fault in Ancient Greece
TLDR
The theology of progonikon hamartema and inherited guilt, and the earliest record: exoleia in Homer and Hesiod.
Sophocles the Honeybee: Dramatic Context and Interaction
Actors and conspirators: civic anxiety in late Attic tragedy
Sophocles and Homer
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES
The Meaning of Euripides' Orestes
Orestes, like Hercules Furens, deals with madness and crime; but, whereas in the latter Euripides treats his subject with Aeschylean mysticism, in this play he attempts a pathological study of
Euripides the Irrationalist
I WISH to make it clear at the outset that the present paper, despite its title, is not primarily intended as a direct answer to the late Dr. Verrall: indeed, up to a point, the suggestions I am
Tyndareus in the orestes