Studies in the Logic of Explanation

@article{Hempel1948StudiesIT,
  title={Studies in the Logic of Explanation},
  author={Carl G. Hempel and Paul Oppenheim},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={1948},
  volume={15},
  pages={135 - 175}
}
To explain the phenomena in the world of our experience, to answer the question "why?" rather than only the question "what?", is one of the foremost objectives of all rational inquiry; and especially, scientific research in its various branches strives to go beyond a mere description of its subject matter by providing an explanation of the phenomena it investigates. While there is rather general agreement about this chief objective of science, there exists considerable difference of opinion as… 
The Place of the Explanation of Particular Facts in Science
On the critical side it is argued that, contrary to a widespread view, the explanation of particular facts does not play a central role in pure science and hence that philosophers of science are
What Should We Expect of a Theory of Explanation?
  • Barbara V. E. Klein
  • Philosophy
    PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • 1980
The purpose of this paper is to provide a meta-theoretic characterization of what ought to be expected of a general theory of explanation, a theory of scientific explanation, and a theory of a kind
How do we explain mathematical explanation of scientific facts
During the last years the discussion concerning mathematical explanation has become of much importance in the philosophy of mathematics. The cause of this interest might be traced back in a recent
Explanatory unification and the causal structure of the world
The modern study of scientific explanation dates from 1948, the year of the publication of the pioneering article by C. G. Hempel and Paul Oppenheim. Nearly forty years later, philosophers rightly
Some Remarks on the Logic of Explanation
1. Foreword. These considerations on Carl G. Hempel's and Paul Oppenheim's lucid article "Studies in the Logic of Explanation"'-LE for short-are an attempt to exploit some of the considerable
How Do Scientific Explanations Explain?
My title question as it stands is ambiguous, and is in want of some initial clarification. Does the question ask how the explanandum is logically related to the explanans? Or does it ask about the
Resisting Explanation
Although explanation is widely regarded as an important concept in the study of rational inquiry, it remains largely unexplored outside the philosophy of science. This, I believe, is not due to
Explanation and Prediction: A Plea for Reason
Anyone, today, with even a slight interest in the methodology of science will be aware of the heated debate which has raged in regard to the thesis of the logical symmetry between explanation and
The Unfeasibility of the “Thing-in-Itself” as an Explanatory Source for Behavior
TLDR
This essay presents some historical episodes in the theoretical constitution of Radical Behaviorism in association with fundamental reflections on B. F. Skinner’s epistemological choices for the formulation and consolidation of his thinking on the relations between behavior and environment.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 70 REFERENCES
A Definition of "Degree of Confirmation"
1. The problem. The concept of confirmation of an hypothesis by empirical evidence is of fundamental importance in the methodology of empirical science. For, first of all, a sentence cannot even be
On Inductive Logic
Among the various meanings in which the word 'probability' is used in everyday language, in the discussion of scientists, and in the theories of probability, there are especially two which must be
Behavior, Purpose and Teleology
This essay has two goals. The first is to define the behavioristic study of natural events and to classify behavior. The second is to stress the importance of the concept of purpose. Given any
Physics and the Problem of Historico-Sociological Laws
  • E. Zilsel
  • Physics, Education
    Philosophy of Science
  • 1941
The question as to the existence of laws in history has frequently been discussed. A new discussion may yet be useful, since some misconceptions based on incorrect comparisons with the natural
Novelty, Indeterminism, and Emergence
The Classical Paper of this issue was written in 1939 by the philosopher W. T. Stace who argued against the metaphysical viability of emergence in a manner similar to that found in two previous
Purposive Behavior in Animals and Men
as to where between the two poles of behaviorism and structuralism they will finally see their science find its place. It has become ever more evident that psychology after all is one; that
A syntactical definition of probability and of degree of confirmation
TLDR
The presentation of a syntactical definition of the degree of confirmation of a hypothesis on the basis of given evidence, a notion known to be of outstanding significance for the logic of inductive reasoning in the empirical sciences is presented.
The Open Society and Its Enemies
VOLUME 1: THE SPELL OF PLATO Introduction, The Spell of Plato, THE MYTH OF ORIGIN AND DESTINY 1. Historicism and the Myth of Destiny 2. Heraclitus 3. Plato's Theory of Forms or Ideas PLATO'S
Operationism and Scientific Method
[About a year ago Professor E. G. Boring wrote to suggest a symposium on operationism and appended a few questions which he said he would like to have answered. The Editor welcomed the idea and
The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics
X is true if, and only if, p. [...] we shall call a definition of truth “adequate” if all these equivalences follow from it. [...] The definition of truth which was outlined above [...] implies all
...
...