Structure and strength in causal induction.

Abstract

We present a framework for the rational analysis of elemental causal induction-learning about the existence of a relationship between a single cause and effect-based upon causal graphical models. This framework makes precise the distinction between causal structure and causal strength: the difference between asking whether a causal relationship exists and asking how strong that causal relationship might be. We show that two leading rational models of elemental causal induction, DeltaP and causal power, both estimate causal strength, and we introduce a new rational model, causal support, that assesses causal structure. Causal support predicts several key phenomena of causal induction that cannot be accounted for by other rational models, which we explore through a series of experiments. These phenomena include the complex interaction between DeltaP and the base-rate probability of the effect in the absence of the cause, sample size effects, inferences from incomplete contingency tables, and causal learning from rates. Causal support also provides a better account of a number of existing datasets than either DeltaP or causal power.

0204060'05'06'07'08'09'10'11'12'13'14'15'16'17
Citations per Year

419 Citations

Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 419 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Cite this paper

@article{Griffiths2005StructureAS, title={Structure and strength in causal induction.}, author={Thomas L Griffiths and Joshua B Tenenbaum}, journal={Cognitive psychology}, year={2005}, volume={51 4}, pages={334-84} }