Structural Holes and Good Ideas1

@article{Burt2004StructuralHA,
  title={Structural Holes and Good Ideas1},
  author={Ronald S. Burt},
  journal={American Journal of Sociology},
  year={2004},
  volume={110},
  pages={349 - 399}
}
  • R. Burt
  • Published 1 September 2004
  • Economics
  • American Journal of Sociology
This article outlines the mechanism by which brokerage provides social capital. Opinion and behavior are more homogeneous within than between groups, so people connected across groups are more familiar with alternative ways of thinking and behaving. Brokerage across the structural holes between groups provides a vision of options otherwise unseen, which is the mechanism by which brokerage becomes social capital. I review evidence consistent with the hypothesis, then look at the networks around… 

Is the Structural Holes a Form of Social Capital? A Theoretical Debate

Social capital plays a significant role in utilizing the flow of information. Generally, social capital can be generated by establishing a close relationship between many people in order to create

Brokers in Disguise: The Joint Effect of Actual Brokerage and Socially Perceived Brokerage on Network Advantage

Interpersonal networks can be conceptualized not only as actual social structures surrounding individuals but also as cognitive social structures stemming from individuals’ perceptions of those

Not all brokers are alike: Creative implications of brokering networks in different work functions

Brokers are expected to be more creative than employees embedded in closed social structures because they occupy a position in the social space that provides them with access to non-redundant

Organizational Misfits and the Origins of Brokerage in Intra-Firm Networks

We have ample empirical evidence of the effect of brokerage in intraorganizational social networks on career outcomes, but we know less about how network structure originates as a result of career

Network Structure, Collaborative Context, and Individual Creativity

The debate on whether bonding or bridging ties are more beneficial for acquiring knowledge that is conducive to individual creativity has mostly overlooked the context in which such ties are formed.

Organizational Misfits and the Origins of Brokerage in Intrafirm Networks

To extend research on the effects of networks for career outcomes, this paper examines how career processes shape network structure. I hypothesize that brokerage results from two distinct mechanisms:

Brokerage as a Public Good: The Externalities of Network Hubs for Different Formal Roles in Creative Organizations

Although much is known about how brokerage positions in social networks help individuals improve their own performance, we know little about the impact of brokers on those around them. Our study

Bad influence: social networks, elite brokerage, and the construction of alliances

If all states want to survive, why do some of them enter unpropitious alliances? International Relations (IR) theory’s conventional answer is that imperfect information and systemic complexity result
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 128 REFERENCES

The Social Capital of Opinion Leaders

Opinion leaders are more precisely opinion brokers who carry information across the social boundaries between groups. They are not people at the top of things so much as people at the edge of things,

Social Capital, Structural Holes and the Formation of an Industry Network

The formation of a network is determined by the opposition of two forces. The first is the reproduction of network structure as a general social resource for network members. The second is the

The Network Structure Of Social Capital

The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance.

We are grateful to Eric Abrahamson, Ron Burt, Eric Leifer, Aneil Mishra, and Bob Yavitz for their contributions on earlier drafts of this manuscript. The paper has also benefited from the

Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage

Scholars of the theory of the firm have begun to emphasize the sources and conditions of what has been described as “the organizational advantage,” rather than focus on the causes and consequences of

Where Do Small Worlds Come From?

Interfirm networks often take on characteristics consistent with the notion of a small world--they are locally clustered into dense sub-networks or cliques that are sparsely connected by a small

Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology

How should we understand why firms exist? A prevailing view has been that they serve to keep in check the transaction costs arising from the self-interested motivations of individuals. We develop in

Bridging ties: a source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities

What explains differences in firms’ abilities to acquire competitive capabilities? In this paper we propose that a firm’s embeddedness in a network of ties is an important source of variation in the

The Alliances of Spin-Offs Versus Start-Ups: Social Ties in the Genesis of Post-Soviet Alliances

This paper links the alliance strategy of emergent firms to the structural relations in the network of new firm organizers. Data gathered in Russia from 1991 to 1993 on nine post-Soviet commodity

Strong ties, weak ties and islands: structural and cultural predictors of organizational innovation

How does the tendency of entrepreneurs to engage in innovation relate to their structural and cultural embeddedness? Using micro-data on entrepreneurial teams and the organizational innovations they
...