Strong and Wrong

@article{Schotter2006StrongAW,
  title={Strong and Wrong},
  author={Andrew Schotter},
  journal={Journal of Theoretical Politics},
  year={2006},
  volume={18},
  pages={498 - 511}
}
  • A. Schotter
  • Published 1 October 2006
  • Psychology
  • Journal of Theoretical Politics
The main purpose of rational choice theory is to lay out in clear and transparent terms what conditions are necessary and/or sufficient for the validity of statements about consistent human behavior. Strong criteria for rationality are ‘wrong’ if understood as a positive description. However, their very strength provides a sharp guide for experimental social science’s project of mapping the properties of individual behavior. 

Figures from this paper

What the Label “ Rational Choice ” Stands for ? Let ’ s Talk About Definitions
This paper assumes that as long as there is no clarity regarding the main ideas developed within the rational choice framework, including the meaning of “rational choice”, it shall remain one of the
Taking Others into Account: Self-Interest and Fairness in Majority Decision Making
Research on the formal properties of democratic aggregation mechanisms has a long tradition in political science. Recent theoretical developments, however, show that in the discussion of normative
Rational Choice Epistemology and Belief Formation in Mass Politics
This article begins with a general discussion of the epistemology of rational choice, and argues that there are important questions in political science for which rational choice theory is not a
Behavioral Political Economy, Argumentation, and Democratic Theory
A developing research program of behavioral political economy can help shed light on important social and political practices that fall outside the strict rational actor model but that are of central
Do Individuals Value Distributional Fairness? How Inequality Affects Majority Decisions
The so-called chaos theorems imply that, under most preference configurations, majority voting in n-dimensional policy spaces is theoretically unrestricted. Empirical research, however, shows an
Experimental methodology on the move
‘performativity’ literature. In another friendly gesture of the introduction, the editors assure the readers that ‘we do not regard [the crisis of credibility of economics] as an opportunity for
Inconsistent People? An Experiment on the Impact of Social Preferences Across Games
A within-subject designed experiment with six games and a total of seven choices is used to test the hypothesis of consistency of other-regarding motives. By the large number of choices, which are
Economic Games for Social Scientists
On the Relationship Between Economic Theory and Experiments
Let me begin by relating a story. I was recently a member of my university’s promotion and tenure committee, and one of the cases we discussed was that of a young scientist being brought up for
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 15 REFERENCES
A Theory of Fairness, Competition and Cooperation
There is strong evidence that people exploit their bargaining power in competitive markets but not in bilateral bargaining situations. There is also strong evidence that people exploit free-riding
ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition
We demonstrate that a simple model, constructed on the premise that people are motivated by both their pecuniary payoff and their relative payoff standing, organizes a large and seemingly disparate
Prospect Theory : An Analysis of Decision under Risk
This paper presents a critique of expected utility theory as a descriptive model of decision making under risk, and develops an alternative model, called prospect theory. Choices among risky
Anomalous Behavior in a Traveler's Dilemma?
The notion of a Nash equilibrium has joined supply and demand as one of the two or three techniques that economists instinctively try to use first in the analysis of economic interactions. Moreover,
Ten Little Treasures of Game Theory and Ten Intuitive Contradictions
This paper reports laboratory data for a series of two-person games that are played only once. These games span the standard categories: static and dynamic games with complete and incomplete
Quantal Response Equilibria for Normal Form Games
We investigate the use of standard statistical models for quantal choice in a game theoretic setting. Players choose strategies based on relative expected utility and assume other players do so as
An experimental study of the centipede game
We report on an experiment in which individuals play a version of the centipede game. In this game, two players alternately get a chance to take the larger portion of a continually escalating pile of
...
...