Strictly Standardized Mean Difference, Standardized Mean Difference and Classical t-test for the Comparison of Two Groups

@article{Zhang2010StrictlySM,
  title={Strictly Standardized Mean Difference, Standardized Mean Difference and Classical t-test for the Comparison of Two Groups},
  author={Xiaohua Douglas Zhang},
  journal={Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research},
  year={2010},
  volume={2},
  pages={292 - 299}
}
Statistical significance or p-value of t-test for testing mean difference has been widely used for the comparison of two groups. However, because of many issues that the statistical significance has, it has been intensively criticized in medical and social sciences. Consequently, effect sizes such as Cohen’s d have been proposed as an alternative to statistical significance. Recently, strictly standardized mean difference (SSMD) has been proposed for the comparison of two groups with… 

A Univariate Statistical Parameter Assessing Effect Size for Multivariate Responses

The statistical significance has been intensively criticized in medical and social sciences because of many issues that it has. Effect sizes have been proposed as an alternative to statistical

Contrast Variable Potentially Providing a Consistent Interpretation to Effect Sizes

Various effect sizes have been proposed. However, different effect size measures are suitable for different types of data, and the interpretations of effect sizes are generally arbitrary and remain

Contrast Variable for Group Comparisons in Biopharmaceutical Research

Group comparisons can be conducted at three levels: (1) group means, (2) both group means and variabilities, and (3) group distributions. A traditional contrast is defined as a linear combination of

Comparative study of psychometric properties of three assessment tools for degenerative rotator cuff disease

The test–retest reliability of the DASH, SPADI and Constant–Murley scales is very good for patients with DRCD, and the highest responsiveness was achieved with the SPADi.

Illustration of SSMD, z Score, SSMD*, z* Score, and t Statistic for Hit Selection in RNAi High-Throughput Screens

Basic concepts of z score, z* score, strictly standardized mean difference (SSMD), SSMD*, and t statistic are presented, their commonality and difference are elaborated, and some common misusage that people should avoid are described.

Defining a standard and weighted mathematical index for maturation of dendritic cells

A mathematically calculated index to numerically define the level of maturity in DCs based on experimental data from ex vivo assays is designed and formulated and could be used as a standard tool to compare diversely generated mature DCs and so better interpret outcomes of ex vivo and in vivo studies with matureDCs.

Transcriptome Analysis of the Human Tibial Nerve Identifies Sexually Dimorphic Expression of Genes Involved in Pain, Inflammation, and Neuro-Immunity

This work creates a unique resource that identifies sexually dimorphic gene expression in the human PNS with implications for discovery of sex-specific pain mechanisms.

The Use of SSMD-Based False Discovery and False Nondiscovery Rates in Genome-Scale RNAi Screens

The SSMD-based method works effectively and should have a broad utility for hit selection in RNAi screens with replicates and results in reasonably low FDR and FNDR for selecting inhibition or activation hits.

Introducing block-Toeplitz covariance matrices to remaster linear discriminant analysis for event-related potential brain–computer interfaces

A block-Toeplitz structure is proposed for the covariance matrix of the LDA, which implements an assumption of signal stationarity in short time windows for each channel and proves to be robust against drastic increases of the number of temporal features.

Iterative data multiplexing (IDM) supports elucidation of drug targets from functional genomics

The value of conducting high throughput functional genomic screening campaigns has been the subject of some debate over recent years, where a lack of reproducibility and preclusion of the

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 28 REFERENCES

Without Supporting Statistical Evidence, Where Would Reported Measures of Substantive Importance Lead? To No Good Effect

Although estimating substantive importance (in the form of reporting effect sizes) has recently received widespread endorsement, its use has not been subjected to the same degree of scrutiny as has

Statistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for Training of Researchers

Data analysis methods in psychology still emphasize statistical significance testing, despite numerous articles demonstrating its severe deficiencies. It is now possible to use meta-analysis to show

How to Estimate and Interpret Various Effect Sizes

The present article presents a tutorial on how to estimate and interpret various effect sizes. The 5th edition of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (2001) described the

Sifting the evidence—what's wrong with significance tests?

The high volume and often contradictory nature5 of medical research findings, however, is not only because of publication bias, but also because of the widespread misunderstanding of the nature of statistical significance.

Why Most Published Research Findings Are False

Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true.

The test of significance in psychological research.

  • D. Bakan
  • Psychology
    Psychological bulletin
  • 1966
The test of significance does not provide the information concerning psychological phenomena characteristically attributed to it; and a great deal of mischief has been associated with its use. The

Toward Evidence-Based Medical Statistics. 1: The P Value Fallacy

The historical and logical foundations of the dominant school of medical statistics, sometimes referred to as frequentist statistics, are explored and the logical fallacy at the heart of this system is explicated, which maintains such a tenacious hold on the minds of investigators, policymakers, and journal editors.

A method for effectively comparing gene effects in multiple conditions in RNAi and expression-profiling research.

The simulation and application studies show that traditional contrast analysis produces misleading results and erroneous conclusions whereas the new method produces reasonable results and sensible conclusions, and may have a broad utility in comparing gene effects in multiple conditions.

The Use of Strictly Standardized Mean Difference for Hit Selection in Primary RNA Interference High-Throughput Screening Experiments

The applications presented in this article demonstrate that the SSMD method addresses scientific questions and fills scientific needs better than both percentage inhibition and the commonly used z-score method for hit selection.

Practical Significance: A Concept Whose Time Has Come

Statistical significance is concerned with whether a research result is due to chance or sampling variability; practical significance is concerned with whether the result is useful in the real world.