# Strict detector-efficiency bounds for n-site Clauser-Horne inequalities

@article{Larsson2001StrictDB,
title={Strict detector-efficiency bounds for n-site Clauser-Horne inequalities},
journal={Physical Review A},
year={2001},
volume={63},
pages={022117-1-022117-5}
}
• Published 5 June 2000
• Mathematics
• Physical Review A
An analysis of detector-efficiency in many-site Clauser-Horne inequalities is presented for the case of perfect visibility. It is shown that there is a violation of the presented n-site Clauser-Hor ...
Necessary and sufficient detection efficiency for the mermin inequalities.
• Physics
Physical review letters
• 2008
We prove that the threshold detection efficiency for a loophole-free Bell experiment using an n-qubit Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger state and the correlations appearing in the n-partite Mermin
Boole-Bell type inequalities for the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger and 3-3 cases
• Mathematics
• 2000
We derive all inequalities in the Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) case as well as for two particles with spin state measurements in three directions.
Bell inequalities violated using detectors of low efficiency
• Computer Science
• 2015
We define a family of binary outcome $n$-party $m\leq n$ settings per party Bell inequalities whose members require the least detection efficiency for their violation among all known inequalities of
Device-Independent Bounds on Detection Efficiency.
• Computer Science
Physical review letters
• 2017
This work investigates the possibility of giving lower bounds on detector efficiency even if an adversary has full control over both the source and the detectors.
Quantum Bounds on Detector Efficiencies for Violating Bell Inequalities Using Semidefinite Programming
• Physics
Cryptogr.
• 2020
This numerical investigation is based on a hierarchy of semidefinite programs for characterizing possible quantum correlations and finds that for bipartite setups with two measurement choices and the authors' detector model, the optimal inequality for a Bell test is equivalent to the Clauser–Horne inequality.
Tight detection efficiency bounds of Bell tests in no-signaling theories
• Computer Science
• 2016
This work provides almost tight detection efficiency bounds for showing the nonlocality of no-signaling theories, by introducing a general class of Bell inequalities for bipartite and multipartite cases and an asymptotic tight bound for the multipartsite case.
Geometric extension of Clauser–Horne inequality to more qubits
• Mathematics
New Journal of Physics
• 2018
We propose a geometric multiparty extension of Clauser-Horne (CH) inequality. The standard CH inequality can be shown to be an implication of the fact that statistical separation between two events,
Two-setting multisite Bell inequalities for loophole-free tests with up to 50% loss
We consider Bell experiments with N spatially separated qubits where loss is present and restrict to two measurement settings per site. We note the Mermin-Ardehali-Belinskii-Klyshko (MABK) Bell
Closing the detection loophole in multipartite Bell tests using Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger states
• Physics
• 2012
We investigate the problem of closing the detection loophole in multipartite Bell tests, and show that the required detection efficiencies can be significantly lowered compared to the bipartite case.
Minimum detection efficiencies for a loophole-free observable-asymmetric Bell-type test
We discuss the problem of finding the most favorable conditions for closing the detection loophole in a test of local realism with a Bell inequality. For a generic nonmaximally entangled two-qubit

## References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES
Quantum Probability ― Quantum Logic
On examine le concept de «correlation» et en particulier la correlation des evenements. On etudie des polytopes de correlation classique en termes de sommets et facettes et leur relation avec la
Phys
• Rev. A 47, R747
• 1993
Phys
• Rev. D 35, 3831 (1987), J.-Å. Larsson, Phys. Rev. A 57, 3304
• 1998
d): to obtain equality in (8a-c) we have to use Ai = Bi (no rotation), and then P (B1 = B2 = 1) = P (A1 = 1), which has to be 0 to fulfill (8d)